Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed several duplicated highways that you mapped. Please if an existing way needs amending/correcting do the edit to the existing way. Thus the ways history remains.

Placing a footpath on top of a service road duplicates the highway which can disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just a couple of things, firstly all land in the UK is private, in that it is owned by someone. So there's no real need to point your private land.

We map ground truth in OSM so I've retagged the name as a description and moved the tag to the relation as per OSM practice. That's relation: 16470013.

I assume you make sure the public using the bridleway east of the woods are safe from any shooting.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended your mapping to suit OSM practice.

Is the shop Elms Trophies & Engravers still operating from your address? If not it should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, You are making things a lot worse instead of better. The problems I mentioned before have not been addressed and you've moved the admin boundary again. You also now have a drain joined to a highway, and highways layer=0 joined to a bridge layer=1.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for letting me know about this. It was my fault, I removed the long original way instead of the short section of new way. I've reinstated the way.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you mapped your three paths on top of existing highways. This would disrupt routing. I've removed the duplicate highways and amended the existing highways tags to show them used by foot.

Regards Bernard.

No response, so as there were several self-intersections which could not be resolved without making even more problems I removed Way: 1313870887.

The corridor needs to be mapped without self-intersections, perhaps in several sections or multipolygons.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've made a few tweaks to address your points and amended some tags to suit OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That; 's the outline of a building part, the building address tags are already on the building outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

That's an agricultural storage pad, even if folk park there it's not a car park.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I think these changes need to be reverted because as well as the problems I mentioned above you've also drawn the buildings over and on top of your some highways. You also dragged an admin boundary off its line.

Could you please respond as soon as possible.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed these three highways as they are duplications of existing highways that are part of relations:-
Way: Ashwell Street (1315770427), Way: Ashwell Street (1315770428) Way: Ashwell Street (1315770426)

Duplicated highway removed.

Hi, I've removed long lengths of duplicated footpaths you added and corrected all of the warnings given above.

Please don't draw a highway on top of an existing highway, it disrupts routing. I a highway needs correcting please correct/amend the existing highway.

Regards Bernard.

Way: 1315295747

Duplicated features removed

Hello David,
I've reverted the changeset so all is now well with routing, there are no duplicated highways.

As for the query about segregated cycleway. Regarding Way: Sheffield Road (449060625) which has the tag cycleway:both=track, (and any similarly tagged highway), the tag sidewalk=both could be added. This would then indicate that the road has a separated cycleway track and a seperated/segregated sidewalk on both sides. The tags can be adjusted (left, right, both) to suit the circumstances, the road would need to be section up to allow for any changes in sidewalk or cycleway. Please see: cycleway=track and sidewalk=* for more details.

I don't have local knowledge so can't attempt such changes. If you want to have a go keep in touch via email by clicking on BCNorwich above.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I now see that your new cycleway Way: 1314420827 is tagged as layer=-1 which means it's below ground level. Please see layer=*

Regards Bernard.

Hi David, The cycleway section you refer to has been drawn on it's right and separate from the main carriageway. Woodburn Road is not tagged as having a cycleway on either side.

To make your Sheffield Road Cycleway similar to the Attercliffe Cycleway you would have to amend the relevant sections of highways that are tagged as osm.wiki/Tag:cycleway:both=, cycleway:left= and/or osm.wiki/Tag:cycleway:right=. You would also have to amend/correct the Relation: Rotherham Local Cycle Network (17613385), relation/17613385 . You would have to amend/correct all the places where the Sheffield Road Cycleway crosses over other highways, making the correct crossing description tag if possible. Bear in mind also that there might be complaints from the folks that mapped the existing cycleway, which I don't see as incorrect.

I wouldn't want to do the above, thus my suggestion to revert the changeset.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I wonder has the warehouse and the parking building been built? If so, there are problems in that the buildings are partly on top of highways, roads and a footpath.

Or is this a proposed site?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've retagged the premises disused:amenity=school as per OSM practice.