Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new highway Aagunta Road is placed on top of an existing highway making duplication. This will disrupt routing. Thus I've reverted the changeset. If a way needs amending/correcting it is OSM best practice to do the correction to the existing way. This allows for all history of the way to be maintained.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. As such fiction or test data can only do harm, if only at a very minor level. Thus I've reverted this changeset. Please feel free to add genuine data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There are lots of duplicated sections of highways across the airport. Please see here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=72.62122&lat=23.07271&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Could you please remove the duplications?

Hi, There are lots of duplicated sections of highways across the airport. Please see here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=72.62122&lat=23.07271&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Could you please remove the duplications?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you've made lots of duplicated highways, some of then not even tagged. I think I've corrected all the problems at the south.

Regards Bernard.

Please consider my previous comment on the bus platform as mapping this way causes a duplicated highway edge as seen here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-3.31107&lat=57.65009&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

The correct way is an unjoined platform area with a service road running through it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You joined your new footpath to a boundary outline, I've amended it to join the back service road. If you are local could you please check if this is now correct?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Unfortunately the tag amenity/landuse=sports_field is not in use by OSM, the nearest tag descriptor is landuse=recreation_ground. The area could be tagged access=private to indicate no public use.

I don't mind what you tag it as as long as it is logical. You changed the tag to amenity=school. Tagging it as amenity=school within an area already tagged amenity=school is wrong, that's why I amended it.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've reverted the change.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The recreation ground is within the area outline of the school, so it was correctly mapped. So I've retagged the recreation ground as such. Thus the rec is part of the school.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tags of your business to suit OSM best practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Those blocks seem to be very strangely placed, not in the way usually placed to stop vehicles. Also not placed as per the image you tagged. That image is 7 years old. Are you sure those blocks are still there?

I've removed the duplicate highway, track on top of the road.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the platform as an area feature does not extend to or join to the center line of Alexandra Road. Mapping thus makes for a duplicated section of highway at the join of platform and road. I've unjoined it again.

A service road can be mapped through the platform area joining to Alexandra Road at both ends. But as this is a bus stop area with no parking it should only be for bus access.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The kissing gate would not be in the middle of Dunstable Road, it would be difficult for vehicles to get through.

I've moved it just off the main road to control access to the footpath only. Please check that this is OK.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There is access, (by your tags), to Way: 1193560233 so I've removed the access=no tag.

The railway platform being a linear feature is regarded as a footway, so there's no need for a separate footway. In any case you joined one end of your footway,Way: 1291220029, to a fence so it would not have been routable. I've removed the footway. If the platform had been mapped as an area then it would have been OK to map a footpath desire line across it. I hope this helps.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You duplicated sections of 12 highways, this would disrupt routing. Please try to avoid making duplications. I've removed all the duplicated sections.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted the change to this road as you somehow duplicated most of it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM best practice is that school grounds are tagged amenity=school, they aren't the building, tag building+school is removed. Also formal names should be capitalised, I've tweaked the names.

Regards Bernard.

Does the grass really extend and join to the center of asphalted highways?

Fiction removed.