No response so I've reverted the changeset.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think you've incorrectly placed the POI, it's in Stevenage not Hitchin.

If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please take care not to make duplicated sections of a highway as this can disrupt routing. The warnings are given above. I've removed a duplicated section.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please take care not to make duplicated sections of a highway as this can disrupt routing. The warnings are given above. I've removed a duplicated section.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please take care not to make duplicated sections of a highway as this can disrupt routing. The warnings are given above. I've removed a duplicated section.

Regards Bernard.

Hi hypamaps,

Please look back to your changeset:- changeset/153295971

I could find no evidence of these 24 new paths nor their name. There was no reference that I could find on the Guilfest website. Further these paths in part were self intersecting and often the paths crossed with no joining node. So I reverted the changeset.

I apologise that the comment I attempted to make on that changeset did not go through.

Features made to OSM must be verifiable as per the advice given at:- osm.wiki/Verifiability

Regards Bernard

Hi julcnx, This person has some history of adding fiction, they added similar footpaths in the UK which have been reverted.

Regards Bernard.

Hi rskedgell,
I did comment to that effect on their changeset, maybe they'll have a go at me.

regards Bernard.

Hi, There is no need or logic to tag the canopy of a single tree as a wood. You've already mapped the single trees.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Tagged as such OSM has no logical idea what this feature is, if indeed it is a feature. If it is a verifiable, on-the-ground feature it needs more definition tags. What is it?

It should be removed if it's not verifiable as per this page:- osm.wiki/Verifiability.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed your new road as it duplicated the line of an existing highway. If a feature needs correcting please correct any existing feature.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. OSM welcomes anyone to add ground truth verifiable data. Thus personal notes are not allowed and are regarded as fiction. So I've reverted your changes.

I hope you understand the concern. Regards Bernard.

Hi, A much better mapping of the roundabout layout. Unfortunately, you inadvertently broke two route relations when making the new highway section Way: Akeman Road (1297481216). I've joined the two sections of the highway thus restoring the route relations.

You should have got a warning about the route problems before saving the changes. I don't expect you could have realized the consequences but please try to always remedy warnings.

Regards Bernard.

Just to add to the above good comment. By deleting and remapping you are removing the mapping history of the feature. Looking at the history of the buildings now there is only yourself as the mapping user. Mapper Vormond's mapping in 2021 has been removed from the history, I've found it by temporarily reverting your deletion.

So to maintain as much history as possible it's better to amend/correct the original or existing feature.

Regards Bernard.

Sorry three bridges.

Hi, Are the two bridges actually boardwalks? If so then the tag should be bridge=boardwalk.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated highways removed.

Hi, Again I've removed several duplicated highways.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new tracks were placed on top of an existing track. This made duplication of highways which would disrupt routing. Thus I've removed all the duplications.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, A couple of points. The linear highway should not be connected to the area outline of the car park. I extended the Scorcher route to the center of the car park by a track section. Secondly going by the direction of all the cycleways it is impossible to route on the oneway Scorcher cycleway, you cannot get to the start of the Scorcher. It looks like the oneway direction is incorrect, or is the Scorcher two-way?

Regards Bernard.