Allison P's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 123957897 | over 3 years ago | Also, addr:city is supposed to be used for the postal city, not necessarily the city the address is in. So these should be listed as San Pedro, not Los Angeles. |
| 123958484 | over 3 years ago | Please provide a source for El Puerto Restaurant. I can't seem to find any evidence it exists from an online search. I don't see it on street-level imagery either. |
| 123993668 | over 3 years ago | This is a private residence, it should not be marked. The website you added is not an official site either, so it has been removed as well. |
| 123957897 | over 3 years ago | addr:city should not be in all caps. Please correct this here and on all your other edits. |
| 123985878 | over 3 years ago | building=commercial is used for restaurants. It is not retail, and it is certainly not industrial. |
| 123992284 | over 3 years ago | Why did you remove building=detached from the house? |
| 124067865 | over 3 years ago | Please don't vandalize the map by adding fake names. Your additions have been reverted. |
| 123919172 | over 3 years ago | This and many of your other edits have the recurring issue of unexpanding suffixes and other terms in road names. "Route" should always be used, not Rte. Same with Road over Rd. Please fix this across all your edits. |
| 123871092 | over 3 years ago | It does not matter. "Need" is never an acceptable defense in court against copyright infringment. Just because an issue is widespread does not make it no longer an issue, so "whatever" is not the appropriate response here. |
| 123871092 | over 3 years ago | 1. The fairway should have a hole in it for the green. Also, don't use Google Earth/Maps. It is copyrighted. 2. There is nothing wrong with labeling the holes. The problem is the use of the name tag. "Hole 6" is not a name, it is a description. In fact, the relevant info is that it is the sixth hole. It is referred to by the number 6, so 6 is the ref. Having a name tag on top of ref is pointless and incorrect. |
| 123952498 | over 3 years ago | The crosswalks' names are definitely an example of "name as description" and should be removed. |
| 123975063 | over 3 years ago | Reverted in changeset/123985846 |
| 122740817 | over 3 years ago | Fixed in changeset/123985770 |
| 123905208 | over 3 years ago | motor_vehicle=private will not prevent bus routing. It is more accurate to say that all the roads are private for all transport methods. Fixed in changeset/123985657 |
| 123904689 | over 3 years ago | Fixed in changeset/123985613 |
| 123787621 | over 3 years ago | Added, see node/9900788088 |
| 123738022 | over 3 years ago | My bad. I guess they don't have a site, but I'm fairly sure it's called Halcyon Bluff. |
| 123573163 | over 3 years ago | I think access=private is more appropriate here. |
| 123738022 | over 3 years ago | The changeset needs to be reverted. It is part of a new development. https://www.visithalcyon.com/ |
| 16399215 | over 3 years ago | "Public Parking" is probably not a real name, but a description... can you delete it? Thank you! |