Not an appropriate use of the tag name=*, should be description=* instead or similar

I think this might be a single building mapped as two.

This parking lot is demolished, please revert the changeset

Picher should be tagged as a locality. It has no people. It certainly shouldn't be a town. Place tags aren't supposed to reflect legal status but rather regional importance.

Just Concord Square, unless the name actually has "Subdivision" in it. I imagine it doesn't.

If there are any disputes about usage of language-specific names, they should be raised with the person to add them in the first place. For example, it is possible that some neighborhoods in New York have a high number of Russian speakers and the transliteration is useful. Even better, the Russian name is signposted as well. It's best to ask the original mapper about their intent.

You can try NHD, but be warned that there are plenty of issues with the data. If it looks wrong, it probably is. Here's a link to the shapefile for the area. There's a plugin to view the shapefile in JOSM. https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5a58a708e4b00b291cd69f31

Thank you for working on these roads! The TIGER data here is pretty poor, to say the least, and despite living in relative proximity I've never been to the area myself, so I haven't been able to give it much love.

I think this is from before Bing buildings added with MapWithAI in JOSM were tagged as such. That would explain the weird buildings. If so, might qualify as an import, though if no one's complained I don't know if it's worth addressing.

No, this is destroying data. Should be tagged as highway=service service=driveway

This is not true. The original address was correct. There is a private court here accessed through 1035 Lombard St, on the map here as 1 Alder Ct. The other entrance is between 1026 and 1028 Waverly St, here mapped as 11 and 12 Alder Ct.

Well, I would not call them non-existent. They are for the vacant lots. If they were to be redeveloped they would be assigned to the new buildings. They are still registered with the county.

It's probably no great loss though. If you think they are problematic I think it's okay to keep them off.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Make sure to square the corners of buildings after drawing to improve accuracy.

Names shouldn't be used as descriptions. Use building=shed, not name=Shed.

Common lots should probably just be tagged as landuse=grass, and shouldn't have a name.

Please don't mark individual plots. The subdivision itself is mapped, as are the houses.

I got a list of every park in Boise and added basic info to all of them. That said, I've never heard of this one before nor seen it.

Yes, it is blocked off, and probably should be access=no, but it would otherwise be tertiary.

I presume it will be rebuilt soon, so it's probably not a big deal.

Make sure to expand the predirectional (W -> West)

way/978054570 is not under construction. This road segment is unpaved but still legally a public mid-mile collector.