There is no island anymore. It was demolished about a year ago. Why did you readd?

units=88 on way/1091717204 is not a recognized tag. It is better to tag the number of units in each building with building:flats=*.

The building doesn't exist. It's another one of zluuzki's (fka Hiausirg) unapproved imports. It is visible on no aerial photos and despite not having a source tag, is from microsoft/buildingFootprints.

VLD190 (and Facebook as a whole), you need to conduct sanity checks when you make these "fixes". What you did might suppress the error as reported by Atlas, but it does nothing to improve the underlying data quality, and in a sense actually worsens it because the error becomes more difficult to spot. This is not the first low-quality edit of this type I've seen.

This one took awhile, maybe 40 minutes. Quite a few duplexes here, interestingly, and some row houses. This suggests age, but despite this most street suffixes were standard. Overall challenging, but not by the era's standards.

It looks like that segment is a shared private driveway, so not part of the road.

Also, year should probably be start_date

I think it's more correct to have addr:unit just be 201. I don't believe it's typical to use a # or the unit prefix.

Last I checked, way/766547555 had two units, the other being an office for the nearby Popeyes.

Most places are only tagged as cities if they have over 100,000 people. Regional importance is factored in, so you might convince me to consider this a town, but as Soda Springs is an hour's drive from Pocatello, which has more than 10 times the population, there is no comparison.

place=city does not mean "incorporated municipality legally called a city". You wouldn't call Warm River with its three people a city just because it's legally a city, would you?

Soda Springs does not have a commercial airport, which is what really matters. Try asking other people on OpenStreetMap in the OSMUS Slack server what they think. You'll find little agreement with a city classification. https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/

That's a cool tool. I'll add it to my repertoire. Also, whoops!

I told you why I changed it back, and you proceeded to lie about me in a changeset comment. Don't start an edit war.

Also phone number and website are wrong, there should be no parenthesis and the protocol needs to be specified (URL needs to start with http:// or https://)

Driveways need to connect to the road, not just the sidewalk.

I think JOSM touched a bunch of nodes without actually modifying them. They were filtered from view so there's no way I could've done anything to them.

Boise addresses are a lot harder to conflate than those of other cities because the nodes are placed by the street rather than the center of the parcel. The low density and random street suffixes aren't helping either.

If you do not know the name, you should just leave it blank. Dentist called "Dentist" is wrong and useless.

Not sure "unclassified" is the right type of road. Service made more sense to me.

Welcome back to OSM! You know, you inspired me to map. I saw the buildings you drew in Downtown Boise when playing Pokémon Go, and it got me to add some of my own. Now here we are three-and-a-half years later, with almost all the buildings mapped in Ada County. Really, thank you so much.

It's a little unclear to me what "manually reviewed" means, but I would guess "all buildings are checked". Just looking at this area (not specifically this changeset, just your edits), that wouldn't include way/1087505016, way/1087508922, way/1087506032, way/1087505949, way/1087506157, way/1087509198, way/1087509208, way/1087508898, way/1087508971, way/1087508647, way/1087508576, way/1087508983, way/1087509166, way/1087506208, way/1087505966, way/1087505972, way/1087506158, way/1087505997, way/1087506046, way/1087506146, way/1087509196, way/1087506094, way/1087504759, way/1087505502, way/1087505407, way/1087505282, way/1087505463, and way/1087505175. I could go on, but I've made my point. That's a concerningly high error rate. Higher than another editor whose edits were outright reverted.

There is no blanket approval to add Bing buildings unless they are all manually reviewed. Low quality Bing building imports have been reverted in the past. Are you sure you are manually reviewing these?