Checking against Sentinel 2 satellite photo, this alignment looks very close. Thank you for updating it!

Thank you for adding details to the business listing! Keep in mind that phone numbers should be represented in +country_code-area_code-exchange-local format, in this case +1-208-345-2046.

OSM is a live database. It is not appropriate to put test data in it for any length of time. Changes are available to download immediately, but the basemap layers are updated by the data consumer. Maps pull data at varying frequencies.

If you for some reason need to test in the main database, only add real data, and do not delete it afterwards. Adding bad data or destroying good data is vandalism.

Spam removed in changeset/164043357

Revert did not work

Wrong opening_hours and phone syntax... image should not be used for company logo, only the feature itself

Reverted

changeset/163845164

You should tag with source=microsoft/buildingFootprints then.

Was this import discussed anywhere? It is clearly not properly manually reviewed. I did a random spot check.

way/1366360594
way/1366360179
way/1366359998
way/1366360532
way/1366360319
way/1366360650
way/1366360345
way/1366360154
way/1366359805

I think house=detached is preferred in Ireland or something like that. building=detached is used more in the US

Wrong location, reverted in changeset/163458836

Reverted spam

changeset/163342160

I hear you. This wasn't a revert, though.

Use the dev server to test https://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=4/38.01/-95.84

I fixed your business entry to remove the spam, and you spam it again.

opening_hours syntax is wrong, "Opening date" should be start_datee, "Payment options" should be payment:method=yes (payment:cash=yes, etc.), phone should be telephone, Twitter should be contact:twitter, and you should add a more descriptive tag like craft=fence (double check that this is the correct tag).

Should service_times be opening_hours instead? Either way the syntax is wrong

I'm sorry, but I don't see how he was being insulting. Furthermore, what may work for you doesn't necessarily work for everyone else. This is why such principles as "don't tag for the renderer" exist. I hate to take it in this direction, but you do need to conform to tagging principles and avoid arguing with other users about their application. If you don't want to hear it from me, then I can refer you to the Data Working Group.

If this issue is very important to you, the best solution is to come up with a design proposal for OSM Carto and OSMAnd for leisure=animal_hitch. But breaking the map is never allowed.

I've never tagged such a thing before, but I see relation/14222679 using a route relation with network = lpn and route = canoe. Something similar might work.

These names should probably be refs instead. Depending on the size, waterway=ditch may be more appropriate.

Remove name=Ditch * and replace with ref=*

highway=service should not be used with route=ferry. What is the meaning of service=loop_trail?