OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
28715427 almost 11 years ago

One more damaged boundary:
relation/2596099

28699165 almost 11 years ago

Please do not merge highways which are linked with administrative divisions. I've repaired four damaged boundary relations: changeset/28749082

28719169 almost 11 years ago

Diskussion siehe http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=484714#p484714

28632639 almost 11 years ago

I've tried to repair the boundary. Please check if all is ok know.

Here is a hole without an administrative unit, is this ok? osm.org/?mlat=43.2748&mlon=-2.8946#map=15/43.2748/-2.8946

28632639 almost 11 years ago

This edit damaged the following administrative boundary: relation/347287

28715427 almost 11 years ago

It seems that you've damaged many administrative boundaries. I've already repaired two damaged boundaries, but there are many more damaged boundaries, for example:
relation/2596009
relation/2593112
relation/4572168

28653270 almost 11 years ago

Viel Spaß, aber trag bitte so etwas nicht in OpenStreetMap ein sondern nutze Services wie z.B. http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/

27639527 almost 11 years ago

Sorry for my tone, I've fixed about 30 other damaged boundaries before and was a bit annoyed.
I've compared the boundary with some sources on Lewis & Clark County’s website [1]. You get redirected to this site when you select "Maps" on the City of Helena website.
The sources are:
http://www.lccountymt.gov/fileadmin/user_upload/GIS/CompPlanMaps/PDF/Administrative/CityofHelenaZoning2014.pdf
http://www.lccountymt.gov/fileadmin/user_upload/GIS/CompPlanMaps/PDF/Administrative/HelenaHistCityLimits11x17.pdf
Shapefile "Helena City Limits": http://www.lccountymt.gov/it/gis-maps/download-data.html
As you can see there are no huge differences between the boundary in OSM and those mentioned above.

[1] http://www.lccountymt.gov/it/gis-maps/helena-county-atlas.html

27639527 almost 11 years ago

Why is the boundary of Helena obsolete? Please state out sources. Wikipedia states out that the boundary of Helena is correct: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helena_%28Montana%29 (Google shows also the boundary which you've deleted)

When you delete boundaries please delete them completely and not only partly. It is a mess, you've deleted only 50% of the boundaries and left the rest in the database.

28468755 almost 11 years ago

Danke, dann hake ich das mal auf der Liste mit kürzlich gelöschten administrativen Einheiten [1] ab ;)

[1] http://osm.wno-edv-service.de:82/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=92

28468755 almost 11 years ago

Warum hast du die Relation von Schönberg gelöscht? relation/4139252
Aus dem Changeset-Kommentar geht dies leider nicht hervor.

28447373 almost 11 years ago

please do not merge this river. The river is split because it is part of some administrative boundaries which got damaged now.

28409217 almost 11 years ago

this changeset damaged some administrative boundaries.

28226353 almost 11 years ago

Was mir noch aufgefallen ist - Grate wie hier [1] sind keine Klippen sondern natural=ridge respektive natural=arete

[1] way/279868700

28226353 almost 11 years ago

Hallo, es ist schön und äußerst lobenswert, dass du die Gletscherspalten erfasst hast, aber diese als "inner" aus dem Gletscher "auszustanzen" ist verkehrt. Die Spalten sind Teil des Gletschers, der Gletscher fließt auch unter den Spalten. Wenn du Gletscherspalten auf der Karte angezeigt haben willst, dann schlage dies bitte unter https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues vor und mache bitte kein Tagging for the renderer: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Gruß Arch

27724079 almost 11 years ago

Hi, I've noticed that you've deleted the boundary ways of the Hibiscus Coast. Is this boundary obsolete? If yes, than the following relation and way should be deleted: relation/2104478

27722177 almost 11 years ago

This changeset damaged some administrative boundaries. Please do not delete river ways. River ways are necessary for rendering + routing + boundaries. I've repaired the damaged boundaries already.

20612095 almost 11 years ago

Diskussion bezüglich dieses Changesets unter: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=478952#p478952

27819227 almost 11 years ago

This changeset broke the boundary between Slovenia and Croatia again. Please inform yourself about the OpenStreetMap data model before you edit further boundaries. [1]

The iD Editor is no appropriate editor for editing boundaries as it hasn't an validator.

[1] type=multipolygon
osm.wiki/Relation:boundary

27773009 almost 11 years ago

I had to revert this changeset as it damaged the boundaries between Slovenia and Croatia in a technical way (the Multipolygon wasn't closed). As you've damaged the Polygons of Slovenia, Croatia and Hungary several times in the last few months (technically), I've reported the shifted boundaries to the mailingslists of the local communities of the affected countries. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-hr/2014-December/thread.html
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/openstreetmap-hungary
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-si