Ich bezweifle, dass der Flussabschnitt "Renaturierung Schmutter / Bypass" heißt. Das ist wohl eher eine Beschreibung und hat im Namen nichts verloren.

Gruß

Ich bezweifle, dass die Sitzbank "Aufgestellt von der SPD Westendorf" heißt. Und ein Baum namens "Baumgruppe"? Really?

siehe osm.wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Gruß

Hallo FraToWe, bitte erfinde keine eigenen Namen. Falls ein Weg keinen Namen hat dann ist das halt so.
siehe auch: osm.wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Gruß

Hello john, as you may know, Western Sahara isn't a country. It is a disputed territory. One part is occupied by Morocco, the other part by Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. So please don't tag Western Sahara as country (admin_level=2) in OpenStreetMap. We had already a discussion on this in the OSM forum.

Regards, Arch

Danke, dachte ich mir schon fast. Gruß

Warum hast du die beiden Teilstücke der Grenze gelöscht? Ich habe die Grenze äußerst gewissenhaft eingezeichnet. Hab die Löschung revertet.

Revert due to changeset/33348208 as this changeset damaged the boundary of Malaysia. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=523655#p523655

Revert due to changeset/33348208 as this changeset damaged the boundary of Malaysia. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=523655#p523655

Diese Straße ist kein Feldweg, sondern eine Verbindungsstraße, die von der lokalen Bevölkerung rege mit dem Auto genutzt wird. Das weiß ich aus eigener Erfahrung.

Nicht alles ist gleich ein Feldweg, nur weil es nicht asphaltiert ist. Ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.

Gruß

sorry, I've forgot to mention the JOSM editor which checks validity: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

osm.wiki/Relation:boundary
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Hello johnparis, please do not edit administrative boundaries with iD editor. iD has no built in validator so you get no warnings when you damage multipolygons.

Yesterday you've damaged some administrative boundaries in Morocco (I've already repaired some of them): https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/280-countries-compare-2015-08-10

Today you've also damaged some administrative boundaries: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/281-countries-compare-2015-08-11

Regards, 4rch

I've reverted this changset. Bing imagery is distorted in this area.

I've reverted this changeset. Bing imagery is distorted in this area.

@Locksmith: And how were the speed limits obtained?

Regarding Highway capacity: I still think this isn't a suitable information for OpenStreetMap. As the highway capacity is calculated from highway, maxspeed and lanes tags it can be calculated externally. It isn't neccessary to store this information in the OSM database.

Regarding the capacity: good practice in OSM is, that every data should be verifiable which means that it's observable by other mappers. osm.wiki/Verifiability
The capacity information doesn't meet this criteria. Furthermore I don't see the necessity to add this information to OSM as you're calculating this information based on other, well established OSM keys.This calculation can also take place in your application.

This would have also other benefits as maxspeed informations, etc. can change and then the capacity information you've added would be wrong as other mappers may not know your calculation formula and won't modify the capacity information.

@Petros, from which sources did you obtain the maxspeeds and road names? In changeset/32601644 you've mentioned Google Street View as source which is'nt a legal source for OpenStreetMap because whe have no permission to use it.

@Walter: There where other problems either, for example the undocumented usage of the "capacity" tag on highways. Maybe a tag like "car:capacity" fits better. But this needs discussion either.
Regarding the fire boundaries: the boundaries had an offset from the existing administrative boundaries. Either the existing boundaries or the fire boundaries were imported with the wrong projection. The boundaries need to get equalised before the import.

As I've already mentioned above, I've reverted all informations you've added due to changeset/32715153 so there's no obstacle to make a new import following the Import guidelines: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
I'm sure you'll get help when you ask for example the Greece community at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=27
and the imports mailinglist: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/

Hello comandant3, as I've already mentioned, please don't make political motivated edits which do break administrative boundaries.

If you have found a boundary which doesn't reflect the situation on the ground, then please start a discussion, for example at the talk mailinglist: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
or at the forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=10

You can also contact the Data Working Group: osm.wiki/Data_working_group

If your edits regarding boundaries should continue, I'd have to ask the Data Working Group to block you. I've reverted the edits which you've made today.

Regards, 4rch

Please read also my previous comment: changeset/32697031

Ok, I've reverted all problematic edits due to changeset/32715153

@petros: please make yourself familiar with the OSM data model and guidelines before you apply further changesets. Thanks