User:U715371/Tagg-Check

Some taggs I am going to check, because the context is wrong or just new and needs to be documented.

sidewalk:width=*

footway=both, footway=left, footway=right

Combinations

highway=cycleway, sidewalk=*

highway=cycleway, cycleway=*

highway=cycleway, bicycle=yes

highway=motorway, bicycle=*, foot=*, horse=*

highway=motorway_link, bicycle=*, foot=*, horse=*

highway=trunk, bicycle=*, foot=*, horse=*

highway=trunk_link, bicycle=*, foot=*, horse=*

mapping_status=*

line=*

Context seems to be wrong

cycleway=shared_lane should not be applied on "Schutzstreifen". Use cycleway=lane instead.

lcn=* is often arbitrarily used by many mappers. It is neccessary that there is a guided route. lcn=yes on streets without a relation are suspicious.

vehicle=* may often be used instead of motor_vehicle=*, while vehicle means every kind of vehicle and motor_veicle only those which are meant at the red-circle-white-circle-sign.

Objects need to be rechecked

• type=street: roles for sidepath
• cuisine=* möglicherweise sollten öfter werte wie international und mediterranean verwendet werden.
• landuse=* with layer=*: All those objects are tagged due to rendering and may have to be reworked completely. Query

Relations

type=street, route=*

Relations without type=*

type=road Relations of user ulamm. Wrongly used instead of type=street.

378848 378848 beinhaltet Wege der Bremer Radhauptrouten

Double objects

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1652233 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1606178 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1909164 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1606565 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1609077 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1909163 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1652234 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1652233 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1652206 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1652140

Taggs to be added

• public_transport:version=* mit Werten 1 (für legacy) bzw. 2 (für public_transport) an public_transport-Relationen
• Dalben: Tag:seamark:type=mooring. Tagging: seamark:type=mooring mit seamark:mooring:category=dolphin

Checked for replacement or removal

• cycleway=soft_lane (was rejected)
• building:parts=* is not necessary anymore since replaced by building-relation.
• access:hgv=*, access:N2=*, access:N3=*. Sollten durch maxweight:conditional=3.5 @ destination/7.5 @ destination/12 @ destination ersetzt werden. Auf Listen wegen Massenedits anfragen.

New Tags

• building:part=column for small building parts with such usage.
• sidewalk:kerb=*. More clear sidewalk:left/right/both:kerb=dropped/raised/flush/rolled/yes/no. See also Proposed_features/kerb
• freedom_of_choice=no/(yes) for "Wahlfreiheit" - if a cyclist does not have to use a cycleway by law. For example cycleway:right:freedom_of_choice=no.
• has_accompanying_cycletrack=left/both/right and is_accompanying_cycletrack=yes/(no) to fix some renderer Issues with separately mapped cycleways, which are not covered by using a type=street-relation. So renderers may now be able to render either a highway=cycleway/footway/path or the street with a cycleway=track rendering.
• has_accompanying_footway=left/both/right and is_accompanying_footway=yes/(no) analog to the above, but for pedestrians.

To be studied

• DE:OpenRailwayMap/Erweitertes_Tagging#Bahn.C3.BCbergang
• Key:destination:lanes
• Key:turn
• type=turnlanes:turns and type=turnlanes:lengths

Done

• bicycle=share_lane
• width:available=*