Proposal talk:Residential Zoned Parking

How exactly would this be mapped?

The general idea of adding to the map is nice, but exactly are you going to map this? Just have a huge, closed way on the border? What if there are some exluced streets or non-governmental parkings, not affected by the zone? Would a multipolygon relation have to be used? With all this, wouldn't it almost be smarter to collect all affected streets in one big relation? We need some info here, please.

Probably supposed to refer to the abandoned Proposed features/trafficzone. ---- Kovposch (talk) 19:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Unclear comparison

1. What does "renderers shall not map it as huge parking spaces" have to do with zone:parking=*?
2. How and for what do you conclude "most of its attributes cannot be answered for a residential parking zone" (what does this mean anyway?) when zone:parking=* doesn't even have obvious documentation yet?
3. If it's "more like a boundary", shouldn't you use boundary=* like boundary=low_emission_zone?

-- Kovposch (talk) 19:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Self-explained inadequacy in relative flexibility

Extending to "non-residential areas when a local street's parking is reserved for a business, museum or other facility" would contradict {[tag|zone:resident_parking}} itself. There's nothing wrong with zone:parking=* overall. If there are multiple zones here, could sub-tag in eg zone:parking:resident=*.

If being more rigorous, the example photo doesn't show anything for resident. Only for "area" A "permit". So you are looking for something like zone:parking:permit=*. Proposed_features/access=permit#Permit_contact_information:_the_permit:*_keys is quite relevant for permit:*=*, although without having permit=* defined.

In general, there's already a lack of uniform standard in these attributes.

• zone:*=* is directly tied to the legal status (slightly similar to designation=*).
  • In particular zone:maxspeed=* also overlaps with maxspeed:type=* and source:maxspeed=*.
  • For the subject, zone:parking=* is originally for zone-based stopping restriction, as exmplified by zone:parking=DE:no_*. Following this format, yours would be eg zone:parking=resident + zone:parking:ref=*, or zone:parking=permit, etc.
• Proposed features/Parking lane conditionals has trouble with making parking:condition:*:residents=* work with the syntax of parking:condition:*:conditional=* without overwriting, and very long while unreadable plus umparsable parking:condition:*=tickets "*".

Making more competing standards is less helpful than cleaning them up. -- Kovposch (talk) 20:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)