Proposal talk:Photopoint
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Generally, I agree with the proposal; in my opinion, a tag for photopoint is indeed missing.
There seems to be a minor error in the proposal in the title 'Why tourism=photo_location?' It should probably be 'Why tourism=photopoint?'
Filip009: I also agree with this proposal, but i do not agree with tagging. Why do we need to use photopoit:prop=*? Why we cannout use just photopoint=*?
Filip009: Also, why not to use attraction=photopoint instead of tourism. Then it can be combined with viewpoint.