Proposal talk:Agroecology

Comments about this proposal are welcome

Values yes/no/certified

Resolved: Added values no, yes and certified --Muralito

I would add at least the three values, and which value should data consumers assume.

• default meaning should be "no". No agroecology unless explicit tagging.
• no
• yes (documented in the proposal) for places that has agroecology practices but haven't been certified
• certified (places with certified agroecology practices)

Subkey

Resolved: Added subkey certification --Kovposch

and another subkey

• agroecology:certifier to indicate which entity has certified the agroecology practices.

• agroecology=yes : *=yes should only be "yes". It's generic. You should be specific eg agroecology=practiced / agroecology=de_facto / agroecology=informal , but see below.
• agroecology=certified : I suggested agroecology:certification=* so that organic=* can similarly be clarified without change, especially organic=only
• agroecology:certifier=* : It could be ideal. However, *:operator=* is already used in heritage:operator=* for the same meaning. Proposing a *:cerifier=* requires broader consideration. For the purpose here, agroecology:operator=* could be used naturally, and doesn't need to be voted through this proposal.

—— Kovposch (talk) 19:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)