heyyy，抱歉很晚才回复。

这个“護柱”不是我加的，你看[history](node/975579535/history)就会发现。而且如果我没记错的话那里确实有護柱，但也许现在没有了，我不知道。我已经离开学校很久了。

东南门那边的osm其实只是个半成品，我还没编辑好。那个时候编辑到一半然后Covid lockdown了，我不在学校没法画图。然后我就毕业了🥲

護柱是指什么？（可以使用简体字/英文吗

Dear DWG,

While we admit that the China-Bhutan border, as a disputed border, needs further investigation by DWG, there are still a couple of questions that we want to address.

1) THE PROPER WAY TO START AN INVESTIGATION.
What is the proper way to show if a place is under investigation by DWG? If tagging "fixme=what's this" alone is sufficient, why have you ADDITIONALLY changed the China-Bhutan border before the investigation starts (as shown in changeset #110858577) ?

2) THE RELIABILLITY OF THE CURRENT IMPORTED COUNTRY BORDER.
It seems that the current borders (and the choice between two ditributed borders) are imported from the LSIB dataset. How would you guarantee that this dataset is consistent with the OSM "on the ground" rule, especially considering the fact that this dataset is released by the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE? [1]
[1]https://geonode.state.gov/layers/geonode%3ALSIB

3) THE INVESTIGATION PROCESS.
Do we have a rough schedule about such investigation performed by DWG? It has been 15 days since the first changeset (#110858577) and there has been NO result. We have already shown lots of proofs [1,2] about China controlling the distributed area, and we think it shouldn't take a lot of time to perform such investigation.
[1] https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%B0%E7%BD%97%E5%B8%83%E6%9D%91
[2] Satellites showing the road to the distributed area from China side.

Please fix this as soon as possible, otherwise leaving the case unsolved with a wrongly-mapped border would be a vandalism itself to the OSM community imho.

Thank you for the investigation and apologies to any caused confusions.

Best regards

孤独博物馆是什么？

Why do you delete the uyghur name from the name label of all the counties?