Hi,

I'm currently monitoring vandalism. Changesets covering a large area area, such as this changeset, tend to overlap unrelated areas. They are also hard to look into, as I wrote you earlier.

Hello,

Please note that it is not possible to view the contents of this changeset using OSMCha
https://osmcha.org/changesets/143296368
or achavi
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143296368&relations=true

This is probably because it covers a large area. Many other changes have been done in the area, and the tools are unable to process so much information.

In the future, please split such edits into separate, smaller, and localized changesets.

Thanks!

Hello sefabaris,

Please do not continue this!

The OSM volunteer team has enough on their hands. These kind of acts do not increase the popularity of the Palestinians.

You probably understand that such damage will not remain on the map, so what's the point?

No worries!

Hello,

Please note that it is not possible to view the contents of this changeset using OSMCha
https://osmcha.org/changesets/143218439
or achavi
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143218439&relations=true

This is probably because it covers a large area and it was open for more than an hour. During this time, many other changes have been done in the area, and the tools are unable to process so much information.

In the future, please split such edits into separate, smaller, and localized changesets.

Thanks!

Handling the manual edits of coastlines that were done during the mixture of vandalism and reverts is a topic that should be discussed when it's relevant and their improvements can be evaluated.

This is probably on purpose since the ways that now include them should be reverted properly before these nodes could be deleted.

As far as I can tell, this changeset fixed most of the nodes moved by mistake in changeset/143091238.

You are probably aware that it did not handle nodes that were added earlier in changeset/143049662, such as nodes 11285524168, 11285555370, and 11285478706.

It also did not handle nodes added in changeset/143091238, such as nodes 11287555585 to 11287555588

Revert of the accidental deletions was done in changeset/143123512.

What should be done with this changeset?

IMHO, reverts should be separated from edits so we could compare their outcome with the expected pre-vandalism state of the map.

@SomeoneElse, Do you mean that this changeset is not a DWG revert!?

Another example:
way/26508703/history had 13 nodes prior to the vandalism (version 8).

It has 12 nodes after this changeset (version 13).

For example, node/1033293880/history
was at location 32.1601065, 34.7915587 prior to the vandalism (version 3).

It is in location 32.1611790, 34.7846907 after this changeset (version 12).

I also do not understand why would there be new (version 1) nodes in a revert.

changeset/143091238

My suggestion is also to delay the repair of this changeset.

I believe this changeset is corrupt.
It moved the marina and the breakwater westward, into the sea.

It can be seen in in the editor
osm.org/edit?editor=id&#map=16/32.1625/34.7935

I suggest there will more repairs in parallel with the repair bot launched by SomeoneElse_Revert

Please note that the remaining path is not connected at node/10963975537

Please note that the remaining road is not connected at node/10862080130

I meant to write

You probably understand that such damage will NOT remain on the map, so what's the point?

Reverted in changeset/143068938