Hello joyboy007,

Please do not continue this!

The OSM volunteer team has enough on their hands. These kind of acts do not increase the popularity of the Palestinians.

You probably understand that such damage will remain on the map, so what's the point?

Bonjour joyboy007,

S'il vous plaît, ne continuez pas ça !

L’équipe des bénévoles de l’OSM a assez à faire. Ce genre d’actes n’augmente pas la popularité des Palestiniens.

Vous comprenez probablement que de tels dégâts ne resteront pas sur la carte, alors à quoi ça sert ?

Please note that the quoted section is about ADDING ALTERNATIVES to the "name:he" and "name:ar" tags.

The Israel page does not override the general approach for "alt_name:*", but rather apply it to the specific case.

If and when a better translation/transliteration is done, that editor will determine which name should be in "name:he" and if "alt_name:he" is needed.

I'm very happy to know this is not intentional.

Can I help in reverting the accidental deletions?

Hello Mohamed,

In this changeset you have deleted 1336 OSM elements, mostly around the Israeli city of Sderot.

If this was by mistake, please revert them.

If this was intentional, please note note that it only creates additional effort for the OSM Data Working Group and other volunteers who maintain the map for the entire world.

Best regards,
Zeev

Thanks!

Hello Marc,

A major revert of the recent vandalism is still on-going.

Please avoid fixing things in parallel as this could further damage the revert efforts.

You can follow the situation on the community channel
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and in the OSM Israel Telegram channel
https://t.me/OSM_Israel

Thanks,
Zeev

Hi All,

A major revert of the recent vandalism is still on-going.

Please avoid fixing things in parallel as this could further damage the revert efforts.

You can follow the situation on the community channel
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and in the OSM Israel Telegram channel
https://t.me/OSM_Israel

Thanks,
Zeev

Hello Fizzie41,

A major revert of the recent vandalism is still on-going.

Please avoid fixing things in parallel as this could further damage the revert efforts.

You can follow the situation on the community channel
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and in the OSM Israel Telegram channel
https://t.me/OSM_Israel

Thanks,
Zeev

Hello Sivan,

A major revert of the recent vandalism is still on-going.

Please avoid fixing things in parallel as this could further damage the revert efforts.

You can follow the situation on the community channel
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and in the OSM Israel Telegram channel
https://t.me/OSM_Israel

Thanks,
Zeev

I believe "name:he" is more appropriate than "alt_name:he".

"alt_name" is used as an alternative to "name". Therefore "alt_name:he" should be used when "name:he" is used and there is also an alternative.

See alt_name=*

בבקשה אל תמשיך בכך!
לצוות המתנדבים ב
OSM
יש מספיק עבודה לתקן ולא צריך להעמיס עליהם עוד מהצד שלנו

ברור לך שההרס הזה לא ישאר במפה, אז מה הטעם?

תודה,
זאב
חבר הקהילה הישראלית של
OSM

Please do not continue this!
The OSM volunteer team has enough on their hands and they should not be handling damages from our side.

You probably understand that such damage will not remain on the map, so what's the point?

Thanks,
Zeev
member of the OSM Israel community

I meant to write:
"You probably understand that such damage will **NOT** remain on the map, so what's the point?"

This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset/142939797

This is a vandal edit and the user was blocked by the DWG.
It was was reverted in changeset/142963410

This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset/142939922

This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset/142939922

This edit seems to be reverted by changeset/142939922

Hello jeslop,

Thank you for helping revert the valdal edits in Israel.

In order to be able to quickly understand the need for reverting a changeset, in the future please try to add a comment in the discussions of reverted changesets

Thanks,
Zeev

This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset/142939911

This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset/142939900