Hello, why are you adding addr:city to every street? This is not mentioned at addr=*#Where_to_add_the_address and i see no purpose in doing so. The adress of a street can simply be generated using city's boundary.
And why tagged you way/9384441 as highway=tertiary? This is obivously an normal residential road, not an road that links settlements (highway=tertiary) or a "Minor Collector" road. You should also read highway=secondary because you misused that too, for example at way/9105577 and in surrounding areas. This is neither an secondary road "that links large town", as it links the small hamlet "Bluffton" with the small town Arlington, not is it an "Major collector": It collects maybe a few people from the 5 farms along it - thats certainly not enough to be a "Major Collector".
Long story short: You sometimes tag roads with highter classifications than they're actually are - you should read the wikipages about the Tags you're using. No offence :)

666 edited nodes ... uh-oh!

Also eigentlich sollten abgerissene Sachen laut osm.wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix#Nicht-Nutzung_und_Verfall mit demolished: oder razed: getaggt werden. Abandoned bedeutet verlassen/aufgegeben, also nicht, dass da ein Strommast war, sondern, dass da ein Strommast ist, dieser aber z.b. halb abgeknickt und generell nicht mehr verwendet/wiederaufgebaut wird.
Wollte es nur erwähnt haben.

Are you really sure that way/160578487 is still used? At the Bing and Esri imagery it is clearly very stongly overgrown. (Esri should be the newest)
For me, it looks like the Parrish Spur (relation/12698664) is divided in three parts:
Part 1 is used by CSX and goes from the junction in Palmetto to one last customer in Moorehead Ind. Park.
Part 2 goes from Moorehead Ind. Park to the RR museum in Parrish. This part is out of service.
And part 3 goes from Parrish to the RR Museum in Willow, where the track ends. It is used by the museum for excursion/hertiage trains. The Spur to Manatee P. Plant is used to store old passenger cars, not to bring stuff to the power plant, if i see this correctly.
Or am i wrong here?

They are already approved - as there isn't any "Change approvement process". Should i revert this edit?

You created node #9.000.000.000!
Nice! www.node/9000000000

Please fix theese warnings. I did not even touch 95% of these objects.

I reverted this entirely, because everything is completly wrong - locations, tags, no source, ...
changeset/109100174

SO MUCH TRASH! Unbelievable.

...and removed tons of imported trash.

Nur eine kleine Amnerkung: Ich verwende "demolished:building=*" statt "razed:building=*", da das im ID-Editor besser dargestellt wird. Beispielbild bei https://imgur.com/a/J01irkk Verwirrt noch weniger.

Kann man aber natürlich trotzdem mit razed machen, ich wollte es nur erwähnt haben.

whoops, i meant "update industry"

Well, that was by accident, I probably didn't notice. And an "import" was it certainly not.

? Why should i "hand-trace" it if we have mapwith.ai/rapid ? What is wrong with this building?

Yes, you can call it "import", and no, I did not discuss it. And I don't know why I should. I downloaded the buildings, and then I looked at EVERY. SINGLE. one carefully, deleted the non-existent ones, turned the wrong ones right side up, and otherwise fixed all the errors. And then I uploaded it. I could have added it all manually using the Rapid Editor, except that it would have taken ten times longer and nothing would have been gained by doing so. So I don't understand what's wrong with this.

Fixed.

oops, wrong summary, "adding buildings" is correct.

Now what exactly was wrong with this edit? None of these 5 points listed there apply to my edits.
1. The large change set area. The changeset is not unnecessarily large, something was changed everywhere in it, not one thing in the south and a second in the north.
2. "Situational unawareness" - no, there was not. These "gnis:Class=Populated Place" tags are unnecessary - says JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/resources/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss) and osmose.openstreetmap.fr When I do anything in the iD editor and have the Osmose layer on, the mentioned tag is always shown to me as an error, and I remove it then. And now the question is why I should not speed this up. Nothing can go wrong if I only download "gnis:Class=Populated Place" and only remove "gnis:Class=Populated Place".
3. false impression of quality - if I manually pass a village and remove this tag, it does not mean that I have brought the village back to the most current state, and then hopefully no one says that this would break any "heatmaps". It is as it is.
4. "Lack of understanding" - No problem, because I understand English, and these edits were only in the United States.
5. potential for bad judgement - also no problem, "gnis:Class=Populated Place" is unnecessary without exception, you can't go wrong there. No one needs unnecessary tags that only cause unnecessary confusion.
Part 2 "What should you do instead?"
1. the reason is that this was imported, but it doesn't serve any function and therefore should be removed.
2. does not apply to this situation at all.
3. a) The orginal Mapper had nothing in mind, since it was automatically imported.
b) nothing
and c) I would not have added it.

Naja, Import war es sicher keiner, ich habe ja jedes Gebäude einzeln hinzugefügt und überprüft - hätte ich die Gebäude selber gezeichnet, dann hätte es nur länger gedauert. Aber egal. Das mit den vorgefertigten Gebäuden ist ein super Tipp, danke dir!

test