Oh I see. I can try and fix this for you, I presume it is at Breedon View Farm?

Hello!

May you explain what you added here? You added some tagging to the elements which you edited here like addresses and servicing on vehicles, however you appeared to have tagged a meadow as being a place for body repairs, however it appears that this has already been tagged as seen in the element Redditch Body Repairs.

Kind regards,
yasslay

Hello!

Just for reference, a consensus was reached on that motorways on OSM should be mapped at the point of convergence/divergence, not the chopsticks sign in MOST cases. The only example of an exception I can think of is the M25 at Sevenoaks, but other than that it should be at the point of convergence/divergence.

Kind regards,
yasslay

Also, sorry for the late response as well!

Hello!

I apologise for the panic, however I have reinstated the park and footpath, and have also extended and added some other ways which I believe are footpaths as well in this changeset (changeset/126313319). I will continue to identify more paths.

Kind regards,
yasslay

I'll reinstate the park and I am very sorry for the changes I made. I'll try and identify other country paths as well.

Hello!

I am very sorry but I appear to have mistakenly removed the path and changed the country park to brownfield land. I assumed this because it seemed like the country park was inaccessible due to the construction works in Faversham Lakes. Can you confirm if this is the case?

Kind regards,
yasslay

Hello!

Axel appears to have also added a few paths alongside some edits of roads in Sweden (I'm not sure what was changed) but I am not sure why the changeset is so big to the point it reaches Spain, they must've clicked a node by mistake or something. I'll tidy up the disconnected paths so that they intersect other roads rather than overlapping them and change them to sidewalks too, as it better fits the placement of the paths.

Kind regards,
yasslay

Hello!

I apologise, I did not realise the edit was accidental. I think the way was fictional anyway and was added with loads of access tags and stuff but no highway tagging whatsoever. I am sorry for the mix-up!

Kind regards,
yasslay

Hello!

These really do not look like real objects. For example way/1044281862 goes through the River Usk and then crosses the A4042 with no intersection at the same level? Please keep in mind OSM is only meant to map what is on the ground, and if you would like to participate in fictional mapping you may like OpenGeoFiction, which uses the same technology OSM does.

Kind regards,
yasslay

Apologies for the vague changeset comment, I definitely did not remove any roads or ways in this changeset, I removed the word 'road' from the roundabout and junction exit naming, e.g. Grovehurst Road Junction becomes Grovehurst Junction.

Hello!

Please include a description of what changes you have made next time as it is considered as good practice (osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments).

Kind regards,
yasslay

Hello!

Please include better changeset comments describing the changes you have made to OpenStreetMap as it is good mapping practice.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards,
yasslay

Hello!

I apologise for how mistaken I was on the matter, please forgive me. However, I would like to note that you removed the base access tagging from the public rights of way rather than changing it to access=yes when you removed the access=private tagging.

Kind regards,
yasslay

Hello!

I apologise, I believe I may have not structured my comment well.

I understand the changes were not in relation to landuse features however the public right of way on this farm for example (way/1054074314) is on a private patch of land, however it is still a public right of way and is maintained by the owners of the farm. I am not sure what I am trying to say myself, but I hope you get what I'm saying! Also, access=private does not stipulate that access is purely permissive (access=permissive).

Also, please avoid the arrogant mindset "This changeset has improved the quality of the OSM database." and it's kind of rude, thank you.

Also, this changeset spans quite a large area and involves a lot of ways from different regions in the UK, (e.g. this spans from south to north England) was this mechanical edit discussed beforehand?

Kind regards,
Yasslay

Hello!

I was looking at the history and changesets and I stumbled upon this, and wanted to share my two pennies (or cents?) on the matter.

I agree with what Pink Duck has said. I think that the access=private tags should be retained. To my knowledge, a private tag does not state that no one can use it unless permitted, and in the latter access=permissive is used instead. I think this is more of a case of a private group of people owning land of which a public right of way is situated and giving the access=private tagging, which I think is appropiate.

I hope this helps!

Kind regards,
yasslay

Church Road* apologies.

Hello!

You are able to turn left onto Church Road from East Street. The no left turn sign is for the one way street which comes after the junction with Church Street.

Kind regards,
yasslay

(changeset/125440872#map=19/51.61720/-0.52578)

Hello!

I have changed the name tag to loc_name as the tagging fits the nature of the works access, as it is likely an unofficial name!

Kind regards,
yasslay

Hello!

Is the name you assigned to the junction at node/5809349635 verifiable? While it is the entrance to the HS2 works, I doubt that this is an official name used for the junction, especially considering it is temporary (at least it looks like it)!

Kind regards,
yasslay