yasslay's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 174039917 | 2 months ago | Hi jajanja3, Could you please avoid placing excessive nodes on lines, please? It makes the area really hard to work with especially if you're working with small features like fences and tight bends etc. It'd be much appreciated. Best regards |
| 169760918 | 5 months ago | Yeah, just clicked on the wrong tag in the editor |
| 162298665 | 11 months ago | Thanks! |
| 160145534 | about 1 year ago | If National Highways are being too vague about the actual speed limit of a roundabout (it isn't as if you'll reach the limit on one anyway) then I'd suggest that we should tag roundabouts as 60 mph where one or more of the arms are single carriageways (e.g. the A4102 here) and 70 mph where all of the arms are dual carriageway (e.g. M25 J2/Darenth Interchange). It might be better to do a blanket 60 mph rule per what Nathan_A_RF says to make it easier since the latter example is much rarer than the former example in the UK at least. Legal documentation or design guidelines would be very useful in this case as a way to determine how we should map it on OSM, which I think Nathan has alluded to here. |
| 159415589 | about 1 year ago | Hi mapeing/demise, I've reverted this changeset as the roadworks at Key Street have not yet been completed. In fact, I think preparatory works just started. Please do not make fantasy edits like these to OSM again - they're very disruptive and can be hard to clean up properly. Happy mapping,
|
| 159738444 | about 1 year ago | changed to access=private changeset/159768504 |
| 159738444 | about 1 year ago | I’d say it’s permissive for this reason. You could change it to access=no or private if you like! |
| 154057185 | about 1 year ago | Hi, The link between Lower Road and Weaver Avenue is a footpath. Aerial imagery in this area is slightly outdated. |
| 159358838 | about 1 year ago | Done in changeset/159383096. |
| 159358838 | about 1 year ago | Wonderful, thanks rskedgell! I'll add those at some point, probably. |
| 159255286 | about 1 year ago | Reverted because these highways are drawn incorrectly. Single carriageways should be drawn as one single line despite any hatching or islands ─ distinct from brief sections of dual carriageway. |
| 159193150 | about 1 year ago | Reverted because these highways are drawn incorrectly. Single carriageways should be drawn as one single line despite any hatching or islands ─ distinct from brief sections of dual carriageway. |
| 159315634 | about 1 year ago | Revert of changeset/159215563 and another associated changeset, ignore comment above. |