OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
31644282 over 10 years ago

The import has passed review on the global imports list. If changes have been made later, then the changed proposal needs to be discussed on the imports list, and then the import can be performed. You cannot document one thing and execute another.

31935851 over 10 years ago

There appears to be a problem with this import, as it imports obejcts that were explicitly not planned to be imported. See "imports" mailing list. Please do not continue the import until this is resolved.

31644282 over 10 years ago

There appears to be a problem with this import, as it imports obejcts that were explicitly not planned to be imported. See "imports" mailing list. Please do not continue the import until this is resolved.

28834361 over 10 years ago

Wie bist Du bei dieser "Adressenkorrektur" genau vorgegangen? Warum hast Du beispielsweise die Bären-Apotheke node/69226060/history#map=19/52.51071/13.39092 verschoben? Sie hat zwar die postalische Adresse "Friedrichstr.", der Eingang ist aber von der Leipziger Str., so wie sie vorher auch eingetragen war. Hast Du diese Änderungen ohne Ortskenntnis allein anhand der Straßennamen vorgenommen? Dann sollten sie komplett revertiert werden.

25680697 over 10 years ago

This appears to me to be an un-discussed and rather useless import, since the roughly 4000 nodes carry no tags that mean anything in OSM. Can you explain?

30173761 over 10 years ago

Dear user drakopineda, please explain what leads you to assume that there is indeed a lake where you drew "Holoi Lake". Please understand that OpenStreetMap is a shared database of facts, and has no place for fiction.

30857689 over 10 years ago

Dear user drakopineda, please explain what leads you to assume that there is a city here. Please understand that OpenStreetMap is a shared database of facts, and has no place for fiction.

30616828 over 10 years ago

I have reverted three admin boundaries that were clearly imported and over-attributed.

30451655 over 10 years ago

Frankly, no - is *any* of these web sites more than a database of transliterated place names? I saw hotel listings, tour operators, and weather pages, all obviously using a generic catalogue of transliterated place names. These sites would generate a place page for any remote village that has a hotel or a weather station. Just because you can write a name in the cyrillic alphabet doesn't mean the place *has* that name. Actual humans have to know the place by that name for that to be the case.

30451655 over 10 years ago

What is the source of these names? For example, Russian names of "Swadlincote" or "Great Dunmow"? Is there any evidence of these places actually having a name in Russian, or are these just transliterations?

30444326 over 10 years ago

Hello StephenDavis, as you probably know all data imports to OSM are subject to our import guidelines (osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines) which include, among other things, that a public discussion is required before the import. I cannot immediately see the discussion of your LINZ import. Please explain.

28435284 over 10 years ago

Hello Omnific, as you probably know all data imports to OSM are subject to our import guidelines (osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines) which include, among other things, that a public discussion is required before the import. I cannot immediately see the discussion of your Charlotte import, or a mention in the import catalogue. Please explain.

30119445 almost 11 years ago

I second Amaroussi's concerns; can you give a reason for making this change? Else I suggest it should be reverted.

30209898 almost 11 years ago

I have reverted this changeset. Please do not modify Gibraltar territorial waters at this time; Data Working Group are looking into the situation and will recommend a solution.

29723896 almost 11 years ago

What is the practical use of a railway track marked highspeed=yes when this duplicates information from a relation? Is OpenRailwayMap unable to make the link between the relation and the track? -- Your maxspeed argument misses the point. If a road is tagged maxspeed=65 then I can legally go at 65 unless traffic or weather prohibit it; however what we're discussing here is sections of track that cannot be legally used at high speed but are still tagged as such.

29870671 almost 11 years ago

Leider ist nicht der Inhalt Deiner Löschungen das Problem, sondern die Form, die Du mit "Sorry... gehen leider nicht anders" nicht entschuldigen kannst.

29723896 almost 11 years ago

Wikipedia says that "Much of the [NEC] is built for speeds higher than the 79 mph (127 km/h) allowed on many U.S. tracks." - this implies that some of the NEC is not usable at high speed. I wonder how, in SteveA's understanding, these should be tagged? Surely it must be possible to record that information somehow? -- I agree with emacsen that you should not armchair-tag a railway track as highspeed=yes based solely on the information that it is used by a train line advertised as a high speed train.

29870671 almost 11 years ago

Löschomat, Deine "Putzaktionen" stören den Frieden in OSM (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=30613). Zwar sind Sammelrelationen in OSM tatsächlich nicht sinnvoll, aber in dieser großflächigen und aggressiven Weise sollte man nicht gegen sie vorgehen. Nimm Dir ein Beispiel an changeset/29639454 - das ist eine besser Community-verträgliche Löschung. Wenn Du dazu keine Zeit hast, dann spar Dir die Löschung insgesamt und warte, bis jemand die Zeit hat, es richtig zu machen und ohne dabei Leute zu verärgern.

29735419 almost 11 years ago

You appear to be performing a data import. Has this import been discussed somewhere before it was started?

29646027 almost 11 years ago

Is your Chinese good enough to make sure your reasoning is correct?