OpenStreetMap
woodpeck's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 29646682 | almost 11 years ago | This is a rather large changeset to be submitted without any comment at all. Care to explain what the changes were you committed here? I saw that you modified some TIGER roads but didn't delete the "tiger:revieved=no" tag. Why? |
| 29640766 | almost 11 years ago | How did you check that? |
| 29626303 | almost 11 years ago | Since Level0 is not an editor that lets you visually check a concrete case, how did you determine which correction was the right one? |
| 29289774 | almost 11 years ago | SomeoneElse, in the particular example you mentioned, the user has transferred data from the "holydays" tag into the opening_hours tag manually with no (apparent) loss of information? |
| 29259342 | almost 11 years ago | This mechanical edit claims to correct for a problem with an ID preset, yet many of the objects being corrected are not contributed using ID but with "osmsync:dero" - maybe that needs fixing as well? |
| 29277191 | almost 11 years ago | Hallo Swen, dieses Changeset ist ein "mechanischer Edit", in dem Du ohne Ansehen von Details einen Tag durch einen anderen ersetzt hast. Dass Du nicht genau hingeschaut hast, sieht man daran, dass Du auch solche Nodes "korrigiert" hast, bei denen das building-Tag eigentlich komplett entfernt hätte werden müssen. Bitte unterlasse diese Art von "Korrekturen" in der Zukunft, denn sie verschlechtern unsere Daten. Korrekturen an Tags sind willkommen, aber nur, wenn sie sorgfältig gemacht werden und nicht blind. |
| 26634051 | almost 11 years ago | This changeset adds houses with a large number of very specific tags, including the name of an occupant and the number of livestock owned. This is very unusual content for OSM. Can you provide details about the project - was there some kind of consultation with the OSM community or did someone experienced with OSM suggest to add this data? |
| 28538063 | almost 11 years ago | Achtung - der "Brandenburg-Viewer" ist aus Lizenzgründen keine erlaubte Quelle für OpenStreetMap. Änderungen, die auf dem Brandenburg-Viewer basieren, müssen zurückgenommen werden! |
| 28527136 | almost 11 years ago | Achtung - der "Brandenburg-Viewer" ist aus Lizenzgründen keine erlaubte Quelle für OpenStreetMap. Änderungen, die auf dem Brandenburg-Viewer basieren, müssen zurückgenommen werden! |
| 28525701 | almost 11 years ago | Achtung - der "Brandenburg-Viewer" ist aus Lizenzgründen keine erlaubte Quelle für OpenStreetMap. Änderungen, die auf dem Brandenburg-Viewer basieren, müssen zurückgenommen werden! |
| 28666690 | almost 11 years ago | Achtung - der "Brandenburg-Viewer" ist aus Lizenzgründen keine erlaubte Quelle für OpenStreetMap. Änderungen, die auf dem Brandenburg-Viewer basieren, müssen zurückgenommen werden! |
| 28558528 | almost 11 years ago | This appears to be an un-discussed and faulty import. The nodes have no tags and are not members of any ways. There is no mention of this import on osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue. Buildings seem to have been cut off geometrically at the boundaries. Do not continue this building import. |
| 28369564 | almost 11 years ago | Bitte erläutere umgehend, wieso Du in diesem und allen Deinen anderen Changesets bis heute ausschliesslich Edits des Benutzers "atpl_pilot" revertiert hast. Ein changeset-Kommentar von "fix" ist für diese Art von Edits nicht akzeptabel. |
| 28299961 | almost 11 years ago | SH17, what was the purpose of these edits? Are you working with a specific routing engine and getting undesirable results? |
| 28122531 | almost 11 years ago | reverted in 28301525 - un-discussed mechanical edit (and the same edit had been done and reverted before) |
| 28122717 | almost 11 years ago | reverted in 28301525 - un-discussed mechanical edit |
| 28254229 | almost 11 years ago | What logic is behind these changes? What exactly is "fixed"? Why was, for example, way/282831734 changed from primary_link to residential when primary_link at least superficially seems to be the correct choice? |
| 28181219 | about 11 years ago | Hallo ThomasDDT, das Wort "ergänzt" steht im Deutschen meist dafür, etwas hinzuzufügen. Du hast relativ viele Changesets, in denen Du behauptest, etwas zu "ergänzen", in Wahrheit aber etwas löschst. Warum zum Beispiel wurden in diesem Changeset zwei Grünflächen gelöscht? Bitte erkläre uns das. |
| 28149191 | about 11 years ago | It appears that you are shortening the names of many roads (Road to Rd, Street to St and so on). Is there any sort of community consensus in Burma about these kinds of edits? Because in other parts of the world - eg the USA - the community has decided to use the long names (automatic shortening is easier than automatic extending). In the future please use the "changeset comment" feature to explain what edits you are making and/or why. |
| 28126549 | about 11 years ago | You have been deleting a couple of buildings recently, like in this changeset, even though they are still visible on the Bing aerial imagery. You have not used a changeset comment to explain why these buildings have been deleted. Have they been destroyed? Please explain. |