OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
146764860 almost 2 years ago

Gotcha, I will check it out. Thanks for the heads up.

146764860 almost 2 years ago

The intent was for there to be no duplication but it's totally possible I botched it somehow. Was there some place in particular that needs some more attention from me? Happy to take a look at it.

110747741 almost 2 years ago

Perfect. Thanks!

135246056 almost 2 years ago

Hello! Quite a curiously shaped thing. Is this data from some source? I don't see anything listed in the few changesets I looked at but maybe I missed something. Would love to learn more.

Matt

110747741 almost 2 years ago

Any chance you remember what the meaning is for the values of tiger:reviewed you have added to some of these?

ex: way/17108985/history

128500795 almost 2 years ago

I just wanted to drop in to let you know that I have been standardizing a lot of the population tagging on place features. In particular, eliminating the census:population and population:census tagging in favor of population, population:date, and source:population.

The discussion is on the community forum in case tat is of interest. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/109016

147340375 almost 2 years ago

Hello! Somewhat unintuitively, waterway=fish_pass should be drawn pointing in the way the water runs. I have reversed this one as that's most common. If that is in error, please let me know!

46640462 almost 2 years ago

Was doing some minor tag cleanup and the work here is lovely. Nice mapping!

146161453 almost 2 years ago

Incredible work on the parking lot!!!

29419086 almost 2 years ago

Hello!
This is a super old edit so no need to go wild digging things up but do you think this way (way/332312387/history) could be a ditch or maybe it's supposed to be the track road there?

It doen't seem to flow uphill when looking at 3DEP layers but also cuts across a few waterways in an unusual way.

Anyhow, just a curiosity that may need a ground survey but I figured I would ask.

98470517 almost 2 years ago

Love that. I pulled up the website as soon as I saw it on OSM. Incredible. Thanks for the insight!

98470517 almost 2 years ago

Hello! There's two pressurized pipelines indicated here (ex: way/902479523/history#map=18/38.01366/-107.67071) but with opposite directions. Is one pumping back up a hill? Some strange return? Would love to know more. The ice park sure is an unusual feature!

146718206 almost 2 years ago

Thank you for investigating this!

146655165 almost 2 years ago

Just dropping in to say nice work on the loops and waterway connectivity!

146522531 almost 2 years ago

Nice! Thank you!!

146612171 almost 2 years ago

Hello! Lovely edits. I wanted to point out a small fixup that the typical river area tags are natural=water + water=river. You have these as waterway=river which is only for the centerline flow way. Super easy mistake to make.

I've patched it up so don't worry about these.

Happy mapping!

146076074 almost 2 years ago

Lovely work! I'm coming back through here working on the unmapped waterways (Lost Creek in this case).

43123232 almost 2 years ago

Perfect. Looks great!

144922151 almost 2 years ago

:thumbs-up:

144922151 almost 2 years ago

The building geometry is generally really nice. A few corners could be squared a bit here and there. If you haven't tried using the building plugin in JOSM it's great and I strongly recommend. This is the method that I mostly use: https://hotosm.github.io/pdc-documentation/en/pages/03-josm/08-menggunakan-building-tools-di-josm/08_menggunakan_building_tools_di_josm/

You can also add the tags for building=house/garage etc. But leaving it as building=yes will prompt streetcomplete users who may be better able to see things on the ground. I have a lot of building=yes stuff in my changes.