yes, sorry about that.

regards
walter

Please don't tuch any boundary in this area. it it very critical and should not be chabnged by anyone. A lot of Reverts had to be done by the DATA WORKING GROUP and others.

The current state - before your changes - is the official OSM decision. again: don't think, that you (in ste states) do know it better.

If you want to fix boundaries, take care of your own country. The USA has very bad and wrong boundaries on all levels. Even Albania or Mali is better.

walter

weil ich das eventuell nicht erkannt habe?

nun, der Tag ist so oder so nicht wertvoll. Stammt aus einen - damals miserablen und auch wohl nicht angemeldeten - Shape-Import und das ganze ist über ein jahr her. kannst es ja zurückdrehen, ich sehe allerdings keinen Sinn darin

Hi Didier, i know that you are a experenced mapper, but last day you did a lot of errors in DOM.

you "killed" 18 (eighteen!!) AL4-Boundaries in DOM by changing them without care.

see list: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1021-countries-compare-2017-09-15

all 18 Missings or Area Changes of DOM are result of your work.

detail: relation/3421245

remember the old rule: before editing a boundary, take care about the other members of other relations.

walter/Germany

a marketplace is NOT a building

walter

Hi, there are many problems with your last edits.
you changed disputed admin boundaries of india, bhutan and china. because there are no international accepted changes (i.g. in the UN), you must not change the international boundaries in osm. event the "discussion" between india and china about the western area of bhutan is not closed. there is no international agreement about that.

btw: you "killed" the boundaries of three countries -. china included.

see [url=https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2017/chn_btn_ind.png][img]https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2017/tn_chn_btn_ind.png[/img][/url]

data working group (DWG) has been contacted and i'm waiting for their action - usually a full revert.

walter

HI, please STOP editing in this AREA until you answer our questions. YOU WILL BE BLOCKED OTHERWISE

save your time, your work may be reverted.

Hi, please stop this activities asap. the area of doklam is still disputet. there is no OFFICIAL agreement between all three states yet.

data working group (DWG) is informed and your changes will be reverted until the agreement is ok

Hi, can you tell me one reason why you destroid the national boundary of bangladesch?

walter

oops, i only checked all ADMIN boundaries.
thanks for fixing the others

Hi. please never ever change international boundaries without discussion. This will allways lead to problems.

and: you not enly moved that disputed area, you did it wrong too.

see: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/981-countries-compare-2017-08-05

all missing and changes boundaries on FRA and ITA are result of your sloppy work :(

i reverted that "fixes" and will wait for any discussion with the international community.

walter/germany

indian community of course. and wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India#Subdivisions

you may see discussion here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=657562#p657562

hi,
please stop those changes. This area is CONTROLLED by India and CLAIMED by China.It is not ok to change that area.

This political motivated edit will be reverted asap.

The Data Working Group (DWG) is watching your activities and you will be blocked if you keep on doing that stuff.

hi,
please stop those changes. This area is CONTROLLED by India and CLAIMED by China.It is not ok to change that area.

This political motivated edit will be reverted asap.

The Data Working Group (DWG) is watching your activities and you will be blocked if you keep on doing that stuff.

Something like that I had expected. I was not quite sure.

btw: you should switch to JOSM - iD is not made for relations. You are mapping since 2008 (me 2009) and using iD? no good ;(

Regards
walter, germany

WHY did you remove mostly all ways from this boundaries? they are like ruins without walls.

walter

Aber hallo! So geht es nicht weiter. Ich habe die Data Working Group verständigt und um eine Sperre deines Accounts gebeten.

Hi,
bitte lass diese wertenden Namen sein!
Diese wurden und werden sofort aus OSM entfernt, da sie nicht unseren Vorstellungen von korrekten Angaben entsprechen.
Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59090 wo du dich bei bedarf äußern magst.

walter

not right: iD uses browser but JOSM does not.

JOSM does: download data to local system/edit local/upload changes only to osm

that is much less traffic than iD.

btw: iD is making many problems on complex relations (e.g. boundaries). ok, just changing tags it's doing well - i hope.

But if you change the geometry, iD will often fail. You will not see it, but sometimes relations are broken.