OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
53768740 about 8 years ago

plese use landuse for an area of buildings.

53768740 about 8 years ago

Hi,

wrong, wrong wrong.

That is no building, and the other "buldings" too

53742925 about 8 years ago

Hi, you are "killing" a lot of boundaries in Afghanistan!!!!

please storp this right now. let us discuss what you are doing wrong.

walter/germany

53722311 about 8 years ago

see: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1082-countries-compare-2017-11-13
https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1081-countries-compare-2017-11-12

fixed:
changeset/53725467
changeset/53755031

53722311 about 8 years ago

Hi, you are deleting all members (ways) from existing boundary relations and then you create a new one with all those members again? What is the reason?

And if you want to delete old relations, please remove them completly. there are allways relations with 0 (zero) members, and that is not good.

btw: after working with osm nearly 4 years, you should know that you have to add meaningfull comments to changesets.

otherwise you will be blocked by the Data Working Group (DWG)

walter

53715123 about 8 years ago

hi deleting a wrong name is not ok. Checking the history and restorenig the old name is much much better.

btw: please add meaningfull changeset comments to your changesets, otherwise your account will be blocked by DWG.

53698046 about 8 years ago

Spielverderber, stand auf meiner Taskliste ;)

53621944 about 8 years ago

hi, wht's going on there? why did you delete all those ways?

53013147 about 8 years ago

Hi, please never ever change tags of admin boundaries - unless you know what you are doing.

53028587 about 8 years ago

Hi danny,

fixing boundaries is a good job - but "killing" the boundaries of the USA, CAN, Ontario and Minnesota is not :(
please check the "neighbors" when you are touching boundaries - and please don't ignore warnings of josm too.

see: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1054-countries-compare-2017-10-18

regards
walter

52907322 about 8 years ago

Great. One of the "toublemakers" is iD. iD is not secure when changing relations. best choice would be josm.
Best, walter

52960754 about 8 years ago

Hi, is there an import going on?
nobody can enter so much data in so short time.

walter

52907322 about 8 years ago

Hi,

you killed the admin boundary of Thailand and this region too.

Please never ever modify relations, which you don't know about.

regards
walter

see: changeset/52919301

52843927 about 8 years ago

Hi, you KILLED the bounday of sweden.

plese never ever touch a boundary with iD.

walter

52751164 about 8 years ago

Hi, you are right. this is an disputed area.

BUT: it is still an adminitrative area too. And that is more important to osm.

all three objects (relation and the two boundaries in the north and south are tagged as "disputed". and that is enough.

changed it back to adminitrative.

regards
walter

52296642 about 8 years ago

kein problem.

Gruss
walter

52296642 about 8 years ago

Aber georg, es weiss doch jeder (oder sollte wissen), dass die PLZ-Gebiete eine note haben. Ist nicht toll, aber historisch gewachsen. hab es korrigiert.

ansonsten: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=666075#p666075

52330500 about 8 years ago

Hi, you did it again.

i had to fix this again.
a) if you think, your solutioin is correct, please enter this discussion and give us some infos.
b) your solution was TECHNICALLY wrong too. Both boundaries of Spain and Morocco were damaged. Ways were missing and the boundaries have not been closed. This is very poor work. Don't touch any relation if you can't handle them.

DWG has been informed and you will be contacted by them.

52250595 about 8 years ago

Hi danny,

had to close two boundaries:
see https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1029-countries-compare-2017-09-23

changeset/52301339

Regards
walter, germany

52273874 about 8 years ago

Hi, please don't touch the boundaries of spain/morocco. this is a critical area and must not be modified by anobody. The current situation (before your changes) is created, accepted and monitored by the Data Working Group (DWG) - and me.

i reverted your changes to get the old version.

DWG has been informed.

btw: Please use meaningfull and informative changeset comments.

Regards
walter