Thanks for the edit. As this is a manmade underground reservoir the recommended tagging is man_made=reservoir_covered man_made=reservoir_covered
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175087194

Apologies for the multiple comments. There was an issue with the connection

Hi bashville, thanks for the contribution. 2 Baltimore Wharf does appear to have apartments across the two postcodes mentioned. Do you have a source for the change? I'm going to change it back for now

Hi Bashville, thanks for the contribution. 2 Baltimore Wharf does appear to have apartments across the two postcodes mentioned. Do you have a source for the change? I'm going to change it back for now
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175085932

Hi Bashville, thanks for the contribution. 2 Baltimore Wharf does appear to have apartments across the two postcodes mentioned. Do you have a source for the change? I'm going to change it back for now
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175085932

Forgot to also add sources: mapillary; local knowledge

Hi ADHBEKB, thanks for the edit. This changeset introduced the disconnected way way/1426667905/history/1 I’ve connected it up to a nearby way based on the aerial imagery. There’s some information about why it’s best to connect ways up here osm.wiki/Unconnected_ways
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171367974

Hi ADHBEKB, thanks for the edit. This changeset introduced the disconnected way way/1426667905/history/1 I’ve connected it up to a nearby way based on the aerial imagery. There’s some information about why it’s best to connect ways up here osm.wiki/Unconnected_ways
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171367974

Hi there, this showed up because the edit uses the tag vacant=yes. This seems pretty uncommon (188 uses in the UK https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/vacant=yes ) compared to the disused key disused:*=* which currently has 10,578 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/disused I thought I should comment and check before potentially going in and changing to disused. Thanks!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171281501

Hi there, thanks for the edit. The noexit=yes tag is used for dead ends which do not connect rather than for gates noexit=yes I’ve applied the correct tagging of a locked gate in changeset/171283426
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171281898

Hi there, I’ve added a note as there are currently 3 restaurants in OSM for that unit. Please feel free to reply if you know if any of them are no longer there and let me know if you have any questions. note/4939539
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171278401

Hi there, thanks for this edit. I saw this changeset by chance but because there wasn't a source I couldn't work out how you manage to map all the solar panels. Where can I find the right aerial imagery for this region please? Thank you!

Just flagging that a couple of the paths you added have been removed since the aerial imagery so I have update the ways. Thanks for your edit.

Thanks. That's a super helpful response and I'll keep it in mind when I make future edits. I might check if it also means some validators should be updated to not flag Wikipedia tag removal in this situation.

In general I believe it is desirable to have both tags even though they may seem duplicative. Is there any guidance or best practice you are following in removing the Wikipedia tags? Many editors will add the deleted tags back if someone were to edit these objects osm.wiki/Wikipedia_Link_Improvement_Project#Mismatching_wikidata_and_wikipedia_tags

Hi there. There is no pavement where you have added pavement. I hope you don’t mind me removing it

node/52253827 Is for a town called Camp so I am reverting the node

This change set also introduced quite a few disconnect ways. Generally paths should be connected rather than floating
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122998969

Thanks for correcting these. I hope to avoid repeating the issue in the future.

Hi there, I see in this changeset you added back the path across the Anglo-Saxon Barrows. This path has been dug up and removed and as indicated by signs at the works and this page https://www.royalparks.org.uk/parks/greenwich-park/things-to-see-and-do/ancient-greenwich/anglo-saxon-barrow-cemetery it will not be put back in. Do you mind if I remove it again as it is no longer present and will not come back.