Ok. Thanks. I will leave as is.

Hi DipsyDave, are John Packer Drive and Cannon Close still under construction? Thanks

Hi GrooveBox, do you know if Oxleigh Way and way/1159734643 is still under construction?

Szia. Elnézést a nagyon késedelmes válaszomért. Köszönjük a javítás alkalmazását.

Hi SomeoneElse, I will send the amail proposed by you so that I can be added to that discussion but also that I can share any information or discussion we then have regarding this issue.

Hi Baloo Uriza, thank you for making us aware of placement tags. We will make sure to take them into account in future edits to prevent similar situations that caused you reverting the 14 changesets

Hi Baloo Uriza, thank you for making us aware of placement tags. We will make sure to take them into account in future edits to prevent similar situations that caused you to revert the changeset.

Hi Baloo Uriza, thank you for making us aware of placement tags. We will make sure to take them into account in future edits to prevent similar situations that caused you to revert the changeset.

Hi Udarian,
Thank you for making the corrections on these issues. The motorway_link geometry was modified to avoid risky maneuver instructions to drivers (e.g., abrupt lane change). However, after reviewing your feedback I agree that that the changes were not optimum given that the solid white line is not a reason by itself to separate highways in OSM by adding separate geometry. We investigated a better way to handle these situations to inform the driver without impacting the geometry and plan to use the change:lanes=* tag on highways from the point of separation as per following: change=*. We have also implemented a review to identify any other situations like this where we have introduced an incorrect lane split location and added the additional geometry. For any found we will be making the correction to reposition the node to the exit split and add the change:lanes=* tag as per above if appropriate. We are also updating our instructions so that the operators avoid rounding out geometry where this is not supported by the source. Regards

Hi Udarian,
I agree that the curvature is not correct in this situation and so thank you for making the corrections. We are also updating our instructions so that the operators avoid rounding out geometry where this is not supported by the available source. Regards