Hi aachso ,
Thanks for your attention to my changeset. The access was given as private as it is leading to a school. We are suggested by the community to give private in these kind of scenario. Do let me know in case of any further changes required.

Hi TG-map4 ,
Thank you for looking into my edit. This edit was based partially on the GPS trace of our driver partner. I have not added the private access tag as there was not sufficient information due to the lack of street level imagery. I understand your concerns about the routing algorithms making use of a private road and I am in complete alignment with you on it. I will take this as a lesson and will make use of it in my future edits. At Amazon we are dedicated to add meaningful data towards the OSM. I would request you to please change the edit performed by me as you have the local knowledge of the area. Let me know in case you have any other suggestions. Always happy to learn from the local community.

Best regards
volojusa

Hi tux67,

Thanks for looking into my edit, from the aerial image I couldn’t find any gates to add it as private road nor there is any street view available to make the road private. Please suggest me the proper edit in these type of cases. Is destination a good tag to add in these scenarios?

Thanks in advance,
volojusa.

Hi tux67,

Thanks for the suggestion around not deleting the building feature. Will take this as learning and use for the future edits. Please let me know if any changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
volojusa.

Hi tux67,

Thanks for looking into my edit. The building feature was added in 2014 which is not clearly matching any of the recent imageries and the tags of building doesn't represent any sub-surface type. So, I deduced it as an old building or a duplicate building outline. Please suggest me the proper check list in these type of cases.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
volojusa.