Thanks a lot, I have already seen it as well. Its not an official name, but sign is sign, so I will not change the name tag.
V

You can look there (https://www.rsd.cz/mapa-staveb/) that this part is not under construction

The aerial photos show only the archaelogical survey (which always takes its part before begin of the construction).

Hi, i live in Prague and I checked it locally and also on rsd.cz. I’m also interested in this road constructions so I’m tracking the construction progress in detail. Few days ago, there was a deadline for construction companies to deliver their offers to the maintainer (rsd.cz). So the construction itself didnt started yet

Upravil jsem zpět na proposed. Viz https://letaky.rsd.cz/Upload/Stavby/57/infoletak_d35-litomysl-janov.pdf?t=2024-09-12%2018:19:06.029

Hi, construction didn't started. Few days ago, there was a deadline for construction companies to deliver their offers to rsd (directorate of roads and highways). I'm reverting those changes.

Hi, construction didn't started. Few days ago, there was a deadline for construction companies to deliver their offers to rsd (directorate of roads and highways). I'm reverting those changes.

Hi, construction didn't started. Few days ago, there was a deadline for construction companies to deliver their offers to rsd (directorate of roads and highways). I'm reverting those changes.

Dobrý den,
podle rsd.cz se tento úsek zatím nestaví. Prosím tedy o navrácení do stavu s highway=proposed a proposed=*
Díky
V

Dobrý den, obchvat obce Zminný je podle přiloženého odkazu v přípravě. Silnice by tedy měla být označena jako proposed (místo construction).
V

Dobrý den,
zkuste prosím místo mazání cesty ve výstavbě a kreslením/přemísťováním původní trasy, pouze změnit tagy na zprovozněných částech (z constuction=* na highway=*) a na uzavřených částech (z highway=* na abandoned:highway=*).
Je to transparentnější (jde dohledat historie změn) a také tím nezahazujete práci někoho jiného, kdo zakreslil silnice ve výstavbě s větší přesností.
P.S.: neberte to v žádném případě jako hejt, pokud byste měl k něčemu otázky, napište mi.
V

Hi, I will try to explain that correctly.
Currently our (mapy.cz) renderer ignores the 'superroute' (or the parent relations, as mentioned in previous messages), so only the child routes are rendered, so only the ref (16 in this (relation/1128459/history) case) were shown in our map.

So I copied the name from parent relation to child relations to 'fix' this issue as the names of 'simple' relations are rendered on our map.

You proposed, that using (by the renderer) only the parent relation (and ignoring the child relations) will solve this problem in better way (no need to copy name from parent to child -> no need of editing at all). We will try adopt this way of processing those relations.

Hope I explained it well. If not (and if you are still interested in this discussion), ask me.

I meant to use the parent relation for rendering instead of using the child relations.
So missing names in child relations will be no problem.
Sorry if it wasnt clear in previous message.
V

Hi,
the trick you described (use tags from parant instead of children) looks good, if it is necessary, we will adopt it if absolutely necessary. But I think that adding the name to childs is generally not a problem. If there is a consensus on that in France, I will respect it.
Unfortunately, we dont’t have time for joining forums or discussions, so we will respect the best practice.

Regards

Edit: "ref of route is not ..."

Opraveno tady (changeset/157594248), k relaci shrnující jednu UNESCO památku - dřevěné kostely v části Slovenska, jsem dal správná wikidata a názvy.

Dobrý den,
asi omylem jste upravil i relaci s dřevěnými kostely (relation/15002225). Nejspíše jste chtěl údaje přidat ke konkrétnímu kostelu. Situaci opravím.
V

Reverted (changeset/157573945).

Hi,
Ok, now I understand the issue. Should I revert my changeset?
V

According to aerial images, there are houses. Or do you think that their purpose is somethink else?
BR
Vojtech