Perhaps could be further improved with max_age=6 ?

Thanks you! I heard about this on CBC today myself and was just about to add it. :)

Would it make more sense to give the baseball fields `ref` tags? It seems like an improper use of the `name` tag.
ref=*

Probably `amenity=vending_machine`, `vending=drinks`

Business does not appear to have a storefront here. I am removing this POI in my next changeset. OSM is for places that can actually be visited.

This data is so up-to-date that the tree they cut down in front of my apartment this week is already gone from the data!

You just saved me so much work on park micromapping with this import. 🎉

Ce changement a indroduit un error de géométrie. Je l'ai corrigé.
changeset/153315409

Quel type de problème? On a utilisé les crossings de vélo partout à la carte sans problème. Ça ne fait pas de sens de le changer. Maintenant il manque d'information.

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for updating! The sign was hidden when I did my survey, so I fell back on what I could find on a search engine.

Missclick: description should be "Added street furniture, POIs"

@ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy m'a le montré

I was on site and can verify that there is an overhang. The entrance nodes are currently attached to those instead of the wall of the building itself. I do not have the photos anymore because that phone spontaneously died, but you can see on Mapillary.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=639009321465902&focus=photo&lat=45.488949788333&lng=-73.583866526667&z=17

The geometry of the ice rink was based on a site survey I did. It should probably be reverted.

Also, I think the entrance nodes for the Metro were in the correct spot before? The parts they're connected to now are just overhanging roofs.

Bienvenue à OSM, et merci d'avoir contribué! :)

Hey, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing! I moved that one crosswalk back in place for you, no harm done. :) changeset/151969273

If you decide to do any drawing or moving of stuff like buildings or roads in the future, please check out the wiki page below. We use a specific offset in Montréal, and it's important that everyone use the same number or stuff ends up misaligned. For adding points of interest like you've been doing, it's not super important. osm.wiki/Montr%C3%A9al

If you have any questions, feel free to message me!

This changeset introduced geometry errors to two ways. I have fixed this.

changeset/151725163

J'ai trouvé un outil que pourrait t'intéresser: https://github.com/Beakerboy/OSMBuilding

Peut-être un image peut m'aider expliquer. Vous avez dessiné le clocheton à un offset different que le bâtiment.

https://i.imgur.com/0kXjc3Y.png
https://i.imgur.com/ejGVhX6.png

Il y a des bâtiments qui ne sont pas à 0.6,-1.54 — surtout les imports de CanVec — mas le plupart des bâtiments à Montréal sont alignés à 0.6,-1.54, donc c'est important d'utiliser la même offset. Quand je trouve un bâtiment mal aligné, je le corrige pour que ce soit aligné avec la reste de la carte. Cela était ajouté il y a 12 ans, donc c'est probable qu'il faut le réaligner.

J'ai voulu t'en parler avant que vous fassiez beaucoup de travail mal aligné. Je m'excuse si je n'étais pas clair·e. :)

Bonjour! SVP, si vous utilisez les images ariennes de Bing, changez le "offset" à 0.6,-1.54 pour que vos contributions seront alignées sur celles des autres contributeurs.

Merci pour vos contributions!

osm.wiki/Montr%C3%A9al