OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
39268577 over 9 years ago

I have reverted this change

39299543 over 9 years ago

H, welcome to OSM
Something has gone a little wrong here, the principal name tag should reflect what is on the ground, and be in the local language. Except in very special circumstances only a single language should appear there.
If you need to add translations, please add a name:xx tag, where xx is the code for your language. I have reverted this change.

39268577 over 9 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Something seems to have gone wrong here, Tesco was already mapped and you have created a duplicate node. If you need any hekp removing this please ask.
Tesco is usually mapped as a supermarket, it it not a department store.
Cheers Phil

38273597 over 9 years ago

Hi h2g2bob
I am not sure that google docs is a valid source of information for OSM, especially as the map it contains is from a source that must never ever be used in OSM.
In OSM we map what exists and we can survey and verify on the ground, not what we feel makes a more useful map.
This change should be reverted back to the signage that appears on the ground.
Cheers Phil

39176651 over 9 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.
I think something has gone a little wrong here. The British Library is already mapped, on Euston Road. It is not on Commercial Road.
I have reverted this change.

39148535 over 9 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.
The Me Hotel is already mapped, although only as a restaurant and the node you placed is on the pavement outside the building. It would be good if you could add the hotel tag to the existing way and remove the node.
Also is the supermarket really called Tecko, should it possibly be Tesco?
Cheers Phil

39069408 over 9 years ago

Hi
I have commented on one of you changesets on this same issue before, but you did not respond.
Please keep your changes to sensible areas, close and start a new changeset for each area, for example this one should be a minimum of four separate changesets.
Large areas such as this make review by community volunteers very difficult.
Thanks Phil

39032512 over 9 years ago

That would be tagging for the renderer, or in this case for the router.
If routers are unable to handle a standard highway type then they are broken and you should raise a bug report against the router.

38937650 over 9 years ago

Thank you

38937650 over 9 years ago

Thank you, however you now need to fix the original problem of the overlapping ways.
Thanks Phil

38951616 over 9 years ago

Please keep your changes within sensible areas, large areas such as this make peer review by local mapper very difficult.
Thanks Phil

38937650 over 9 years ago

Hi, something has gone wrong with this edit.
You seem to have deleted the cul-de-sac spur which is obviously wrong.
The road had been drawn incorrectly with overlapping ways, but that should have been fixed rather than simply making the bug report go away.
Please revert your changes and fix the problem correctly.
Thanks Phil

38782570 over 9 years ago

Thank you for your reply.
As long as you can get the road connections correct(ish) you could add it in roughly, with a fixme tag and then improve it when you can.
Cheers Phil

38782570 over 9 years ago

Hi, does this path really just end with no connectivity to to other ways?
Cheers Phil

38767875 over 9 years ago

Hi
I'm not certain that #hotosm #Missingmaps is an appropriate changeset comment here, may something like Recycling in Loogabarooga would have been more appropriate?
Cheers Phil

38718307 over 9 years ago

Hi, I have fixed the two saints way relation and tidied the oneway tags. It all looks fine now.
The bus route relations through the roundabout were fine.
Cheers Phil

38693048 over 9 years ago

I have reverted this, changed it to a track and added access=private to indicate that it is not a right of way so will not be used by routers or map users.
That way it will not be incorrectly replaced as a right of way and is useful a navigational point.

38693048 over 9 years ago

If it 'looks like a farmers track to fields' then it is visible and should be mapped and tagged as access=private. As it appears on OS maps is there any point hiding it on OSM?

38612976 over 9 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for you contribution, however it looks like a strange place to find a playground and I cannot see one on bing imagery, did you intend it to be something else?
Cheers Phil

38557874 almost 10 years ago

Hi, thank you for your edit however are you sure they are all bookmakers? Did you visit them to check?
Ladbrookes operate casinos as well as bookmakers, therefore edits such as this require an on the ground survey.
Cheers Phil