Hi, welcome to OSM.
Have you surveyed this location, is it a real bricks and mortar shop that is verifiable and I can visit?
The web site makes me suspicious that it is not a real shop (its hardly in a location to catch passing trade, but a marker for a web/phone business.
If verifiable, it is certainly not a bike shop, it should be tagged as amenity=bicycle_rental.
The web address should not be in the name tag, that really shouldn't appear on the map. The name is Beddgelert Bikes.
Cheers Phil

Please could you point me to where these routes are verifiable in the UK.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are you sure the speed limit is only 10mph?

Cheers Phil

E roads are not signposted in the UK, there is little point on a island where ferry/shuttle prices/schedules are far more important than E numbers.
We do not add int_ref to roads for this reason however the E13 is mapped as a relation making these additions unnecessary,
Cheers Phil

Please can you explain this, it looks like a doodle/vandalism to me.

S'il vous plaît pouvez -vous expliquer cela , il ressemble à un doodle / vandalisme pour moi.

Thanks/Merci

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Something seems to have gone wrong here, the building now seems to be a very strange shape, would you like help fixing it?

What is the source of the 20 mph speed limits you have added for Taunton Mews and Huntsworth Mews? They do not appear on mapillary so I am wondering if they are genuine?
Also Huntsworth Mews looks too narrow to have lane markings, the lanes=2 tag should only be used when the road is marked with lanes. These are obviously very unusual for residential streets.
Also please can you explain why you see the need to add pointless tags such as foot=yes bicycle=yes to residential roads?
All they do is make the important, not default tags harder to spot for othe mappers in the community.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
I assume the path still exists, so should really not be deleted as it is still useful for navigation.
In this case the foot=permissive tag should simply be removed. The access=private will do the rest.
Do you need any help restoring it?
Cheers Phil

Hi
I have spotted that you have made this edit in an area I am familiar with this and I am wondering what the source of this information was. You seem to have added lanes=2 to many roads and I wonder if you surveyed them? For example way/38685754 doesn't have lanes for most of its length so this can be confusing to routers. Also you have added many pointless tags such as foot=yes, bicycle=yes, oneway=no. These are completely unnecessary on most roads and just add clutter to make it difficult for mappers to spot the important tags.
Please could you tell me your sources and why you believe these tags add anything?
Obviously in a city centre where most roads are oneway, then the odd one that isn't oneway=no is useful, however in the countryside this is not the case.
Thanks Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your addition, however the hotel is already mapped as a way, which is the preferred method of mapping large buildings.
I am going to revert this duplication

Hi, welcome to OSM. I see you have created a footpath, however it doesn't connect to anything. Would it be possible to continue it along its full route.
Give me a shout if you need any help.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
The Baozi Inn is already mapped, you have therefore created a duplicate and it is in the middle of Newport court.
I am reverting this.

I have reverted this, and your other changeset.
I did spot that prior to your original change, the towpath had been drawn under the bridge and you incorrectly moved it into the field.

Hi, this seems to have gone wrong again so ask please stop editing in the UK and leave notes that the local community can deal with the issues as they posses the local knowledge.
I am not sure why mapbox care about isolated bridges on the canal network, but they are not an error.
In this case you have now deleted an entire section of towpath (way/327119715/history), that is not good as it forms a walking and cycling route.
Also please be careful with your changeset comments, this is not Texas

I have reverted this, please use bookmarks rather than add place to store personal information

Hi, welcome to osm. This looks a little weird, I am fairly sure the isn't a caravan site in the middle of Legolands car park.
Please can you confirm what you were trying to achieve ?

Hi, are you sure about this?
You have just connected a towpath (way/327119715) to a bridge at level 1.
First sanity check is how would this work without disconnecting the horse from the boat?
Bing imagery fortunately answers this, the path is under the bridge, there is no connection. The fixme on the way confirms that the towpath is not necessarily accurate.
I am not sure why mapbox seem to want to fix things in areas where there are many local mappers and many more who have experience of the Midlands country, in cases like this a note is by far the best option.
Please revert this change, isolated bridges along canals is no an error.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your edit, however Hubbub is already mapped with the tagged on the buidling way, which is obviouly the prefered method. Your node is therefore a duplicate and really should be removed.
Please let me know if you need any assistance with this.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
This seems to have gone wrong a little, it is very unusual for a postbox to have a name. Are you sure thats what you intended, although your changeset comment seems to confirm it was.
If you need any help fixing this, just ask.

Hi, something has gone a little wrong here.
Notes were left by a local mapper to indicate things that need a survey.
The nodes you have deleted contain more information than that of the business, there is address data there too which remains valid when the premises are taken over and it also maintains history.
The note on the lamplighters specifically says it is now a restaurant so that is what the node should become. The note indicates that a passing mapper needs to look at the new name.
I am reverting this change.