Hi, I suspect this should be tagged as access=private, it doesn't look like a place anybody can visit.

Hey, you seem to have moved the cyclelane to the right hand side of the road, even though it is clearly visible on the left on bing. Remember we drive on the left and a cycle lane on the right would be very dangerous.

Hi again.
You seem to have disconnected footway way/356357160 from the road, is there any reason for doing this? as you have left it it prevents use of the path for routing.
Cheers Phil

Hi
I am not sure how well you know Shrewsbury or when you , but Emstry Island was remodeled about 6 months ago. It no longer looks like bing imagery. There are a couple of recent traces on mapillary which show how it now looks.
When remote mapping, it is useful to compare the date of the bing imagery with the dates of the on the ground edits, especially when made by local mappers.
I am reverting this edit as it does not match the current on the ground layout.

Please spit your edits into sensible size areas.
Vast areas, such as this, make review of your changes by local mappers very difficult and make it look like you are trying to hide something.
Thanks

I have reverted this, you had deleted a park and re-added it less much detail which our volunteers had worked on.
Please remember that this is a live map, and is visible to everyone and is not a private map or a marketing tool.
If you need a customised map you could try http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/

Hi, welcome to OSM.
What is the source of this name, I cannot see it on the map you claim as the source.
Also looking at bing imagery it doesn't look like it is at the highest point, 2 1/2 inch mapping is a useful source, but it cannot provide the positional accuracy of standing there with a GPS.
The old map actually shows a trigpoint rather than a peak, trigpoint are not necessarily on a peak, and does it still exist, I cannot see it on bing imagery and you often can.
Remember we are here to help, we are a community and that works best with goog communication.
Thanks Phil

Hi
This should have the tag amenity=dentist, then the name should be what is on the sign, probably name="Saving Faces"

What is there now?
Has a building or wall been put there or are there bollards allowing pedestrians/cyclists through?

This looks like some sort of personal route, please remember that osm is public and personal data has no place on the map.

Hi Craig
What is the source of these additions?
Do they exist on the ground?

Does this restaurant have a name?

Hi Manik
This should probably be tagged as shop=shoes as well.
Probably draw the building as shop=shoes and add the cafe node inside it.

Hi, welcome to osm.
The driveway should be tagged as private , not removed. The point where it joins the B4570 is a useful navigation point.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your addition, however you seem to have deleted both Symons Hill and Glasney Road.
I have restored these, so the map is all good.
Keep on mapping and if you need any help, just ask.
Phil

I have reverted and fixed this one too, rather than delete the footpath it should have been connected to the A1014.

I have fixed it, the imagery is very clear in this area and the likely route is clear as day.
Out of copyright OS 1937-61 confirms that there was no building on the line of the path, it just wasn't drawn very well.
To assume a PROW has gone because of development is wrong, an alternative is one of the perrequisits of gaining planning permission.

Hi, you seem to have deleted a footpath which passes through a housing estate.
Why have you deleted this when it clearly needs to be fixed and the obvious legal line is clearly visible on aerial imagery.
I am reverting this change

Hi, welcome to OSM.
This is useful stuff to add, however you should probably add an extra tag amenity=community_centre to ensure it shows up in searches.

Hi, I assume that the resturant and fish and chip shop are only open to people staying at the caravan park and should be tagged access=private.
Cheers Phil