OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
31638320 over 10 years ago

Hi, welcome to Openstreetmap.
This edit looks a little odd, you have added a hospital node on top of a church.
Were you trying to place it elsewhere, or is the church incorrectly mapped?

31581446 over 10 years ago

HI welcome to OSM.
I see you have deleted a restaurant node, has it closed and what has it been replaced with. When editing (especially deleting) it is helpful to add a comment as to why you are changing the map.
You have also deleted a seamark node for a bell, has the bell really been removed?
Detail is here node/1543923217/history

31491908 over 10 years ago

Does this box have any meaning?

31447063 over 10 years ago

Please add meaningful comments

31477324 over 10 years ago

What is this? I don't think sculptures would be allowed in Bradgate Park.

30528688 over 10 years ago

The boundaries are taken from the latest OS Boundaryline, so can be assumed to indicate the official boundaries.
I part way through a project to add the Shropshire parish boundaries, some sections of the Severn have yet to be joined to the parish boundaries.
I am not sure how "the main flow" can be determined without local knowledge, it certainly cannot be by looking at bing imagery, the main flow will be the deepest channel, not the widest.

31420843 over 10 years ago

Hi
You seem to have deleted several bus stops in this changeset. Have the buses stopped running here?
This is a case where a changeset comment explaining your actions would be really useful.

31421000 over 10 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM.
What is the shop now?

31315420 over 10 years ago

Agree totally, changesets covering such a vast area make review very difficult and make us suspicious you are trying to hide something.

31152055 over 10 years ago

Hi Tracy, welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution.
One minor problem when adding footpaths is that you have not joined them to the roads. This is a common mistake, the path does need to join the road otherwise no router will use it. Bear in mind that the line is the centre of the road. If you could join these it would be appreciated and keep adding the useful stuff.
Thanks Phil

30899609 over 10 years ago

Hi Simon, did you by any chance notice what Coppice Lane is? It is tagged as highway=road which should be changed.

Thanks Phil

30674542 over 10 years ago

Reverted in changeset/30817091

30750558 over 10 years ago

Hi Edward
I suspect name:en for node/3495186857 should be left blank.

Cheers Phil

30674542 over 10 years ago

Please can you explain this changeset, what is it supposed to mean.

I cannot get my head around this way/341908891 and I know the area very well.
And way/341908892 is even more bizarre, stretching from Leicester to the coast.

30528688 over 10 years ago

Hi
I have spotted that you have edited the River Severn in Shropshire.
The river forms parts of Montford/Ford parish boundaries and in moving the river flow you have moved the boundaries so that they no longer follow the official lines.
I am not sure what source you used to determine the main flow, although as you are no doubt aware the severn is a strange river and the widest path is not always the deepest or fastest.

30327326 over 10 years ago

The park and ride wasn't residential last time I was there.
Monster, arbitrary landuse makes detailed mapping more difficult.
It should never cross major roads.

30310405 over 10 years ago

A lot of this residential area isn't, it needs breaking into managable areas and surveying properly.

30341834 over 10 years ago

I am not sure I would call The Golden Mile residential.

30417756 over 10 years ago

Probably just a normal bridge, there would be no need for a drawbridge for canal traffic.

30399299 over 10 years ago

Tags such as access=yes, bicycle=yes, cycleway=no, foot=yes, horse=yes, motor_vehicle=yes,
oneway=no are totally unescessary on highway=unclassified as they are general rules.
They only serve to clutter the tagging and make peer review more difficult.