I have removed this footway because after going for a walk I found it is a private area.
It is certainly artificial but its not intelligent.

Cheers Phil

Hello
I am puzzled as to why way/1338100284 is on layer -1?

Cheers Phil

Hello
Thank you for your edit.

Unfortunately barrier=yes isn't very effective for blocking routers as it is prottey vague, it nay be gate or a stile which are passable.

After a survey I have updated them to barrier=fence.

Cheers Phil

Also note note/485337 suggests it doesn't exist.
Maybe you should have visited when you went walkabout

Really? way/1341839495/history/1 is a sidewalk?
Cheers Phil

Hello
I would expect the name:br to simply be Kergent, qadding the English name as a hyphenated name looks like you are tagging for a particular renderer.
Cheers Phil

Hello VLD295
Phil from the Data Working Group here.
Just wondering when you surveyed this as oneway footways are very unusual. Did you not think it odd?

I have reverted the damage to Costa.

Cheers Phil

Hello
Thank you for your edit, however please keep them in sensible bounding boxes, generally that mean objects that are related in some way.
For some reason you have deleted a lot of tags from Costa at Belfast Airport?
Just wondering why?

Also your edits are very spread out and gates inside airports generally need survey, what sources are you using.

Cheers Phil

There are no signs on the bridge, just these signs at each end of the road.

The width limit will apply to the barriers https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=129075302573824

Note to self to check payment methods.

See also https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1097517367413894

Its a privately operated road/bridge so the signs don't really conform to what is found on public roads.

Also a maxwidth of 2m2.

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=52.705742%7E-2.757386&lvl=16.5&style=x&pi=4.4&dir=149.9 may help.
Appears to be goods over 3t, which is odd.
I think I need to go and get some recent photos.
Cheers Phil

These edits have been reverted after complaints made to the Data Working Group.
Please do not add such data which has the potential to put the occupants at risk to OSM in the future.

Hello
Phil from the DWG here.
What sources did you use to double check?

Yes, a typo, adjacent keys.

Fixed.

Thank you

Thank you Robert

Et la réponse de VLD299 est?

Hello Amelia
What sources are using for these edits as your US locale suggests you are not UK based and seem to be adding a lot of tourist accommodation.

This appears to be a single apartment within a large building, the entire building, not the entire building and is unlikely to be verifiable so therefore doesn't belong in OSM.

Cheers Phil

This appears to be a s

Should this be reverted?