OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
170838994 4 months ago

That is fine thanks, I believe you.

170838994 4 months ago

Hello Wendi
What is the source of these edits in Panama?

After making similar incorrect edits in London (which have been reverted after not responding to comments), you seem to moved on to Panama.

Cheers Phil

170767065 4 months ago

Hello
Public rights of way references should not be put in the name tags but in prow_ref. prow_ref:cy prow_ref:en

Cheers Phil

170726051 4 months ago

What is the source of this edit?

There is no change in FHRS.

Cheers Phil

154699200 4 months ago

Why are there two Asparagus Trail relations

170480951 4 months ago

What is the source these shops. They look unlikely.

Cheers Phil

48294807 4 months ago

Beyond a translation, which we do not do, what on the ground evidence is there of this and other roads in the area having Welsh names? Streetside shows only English names so unfortunately there should only be English names in OSM.
Cheers Phil

48294807 4 months ago

Hello
I know this was a long time ago but what was the source for name:cy for way/6239993/history/4 as Wtra isn't a word.
Cheers Phil

170246998 4 months ago

way/1319606643 is a weird looking static caravan :)
Phil

73227007 5 months ago

A campsite with no drinking water?

Cheers Phil

168911181 5 months ago

Hello Vladislav
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

I am a bit concerned by this edit and have some questions.
What is there in the names that in any way could be described as profanities?
What guided you to this changeset, was it some sort of report or do you have a query which targets certain words?

As a bare minimum Evan deserved at least the courtesy of a changeset comment explaining what you think is wrong before a revert.

135948239 6 months ago

Is Seafood Shack really operated by Age Concern?
I suspect you didn't check all the tags.
Cheers Phil

167322549 6 months ago

Hello Jshaughn
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

Openstreetmap is a map of the world and should reflect reality. Changing this for your own ends is considered vandalism

I have reverted your edits and added a private tag, this will prevent this driveway being used as a shortcut whilst allowing deliveries to be made to you and your neighbours..

167991007 6 months ago

Reverted by DWG

167990639 6 months ago

Reverted by DWG

167918308 6 months ago

Hi
Foot=permissive is very unlikey for these urban paths, they should be foot=yes.

There is no need for motor vehicle or horse tags on a footway.

Cheers Phil

167800753 6 months ago

Hello Alwyn from Wem, where the sweet peas grow.

My main comment is that you have spelt the name of my hometown wrong, it is Wem, not Wen. That is in the changeset comments and the from and to tags.

When you are passing through PM me and maybe join me for a beer.

Cheers Phil

167859535 6 months ago

Hello Shan
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

Please can you explain these edits and your workflow?

What does source=deduce mean?

Cheers Phil

167651641 6 months ago

Hi Dan
OSM derives the relationship from level 10 being inside a level 6 or 8 inside a level 4 up to being inside a level 2 UK.
Cheers Phil

167650856 6 months ago

Hi Dan
I was atlking about your additions to the higher admin boundaries.

Reverting does just create a new version. We (the data working group) can redact but we only do that for thing that need tags be not seen.

The review requested is a bit misleading, it merely sets a flag that someone may spot but setting it no way guarantees anything will happen.

Cheers Phil