OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
164631276 8 months ago

Bore da
What is the source of this name?

Diolch
Phil

164875085 8 months ago

Although the ref tag should only be used if signed on the ground, which is very unusual.
Cheers Phil

164473483 8 months ago

Hi Tom
Is node/12716223148 really a kissing gate blocking the entire track? A kissing gate alongside a vehicle gate seems much more likely.
Thanks Phil

164473483 8 months ago

Hi Tom
I am happy to fix it. There are a few other things I can fix at the same time.

Cheers Phil

164473483 8 months ago

Hello
Andy asked me to use my local knowledge and look at his fix to the Leicestershire Round.
What I have spotted is that you have changed the track around the reservoir to a footway. This isn't really accurate, it can be used by service vehicles and mobility scooters. Footway implies something much narrower.
It should be restored to a track with access tags added along with a tracktype.

Hope this makes sense.
Phil

134071214 9 months ago

Hello
I know this edit was mad 2 years ago but if way/33478285 is oneway and way/1159381827 is private how do customers get out?

Cheers Phil

109302019 9 months ago

Thank you.
Looks a nice site.

109302019 9 months ago

Hello
Cash withdrawal fee is a very odd tag for a campsite, I assume it was meant to be something else?
Cheers Phil

163585919 9 months ago

Hi
Welcome to OSM.
We do not generally add proposed features until construction has began. Proposals are likely to change or may never happen.
Also what is the license of the official plans you are copying? Please can you provide a link.
Cheers
Phil (OSMF Data Working Group)

163573127 9 months ago

Hello Anon
The population tag for the Leicester node should be the population of the city. The value you have added is the population of Greater Leicester which inlcudes Oadby, Wigston and Glenfield which are in the county. The wikipedia is confusing.
Cheers Phil

163001533 10 months ago

Reverted in 163178856

163001543 10 months ago

Reverted in 163178856

163001551 10 months ago

Reverted in 163178856

163001564 10 months ago

Reverted in 163178856

163001572 10 months ago

Reverted in 163178856

163178856 10 months ago

Reverted in changeset/163178856

163113856 10 months ago

Merci Alain
Plus de questions que de réponses. Qui vous a formé à l'utilisation de josm?
Où se trouvent les nœuds de remplacement de ceux que vous avez supprimés?
Qui est l'organisateur de ce projet?
Y a-t-il une page wiki qui détaille ce projet comme nécessaire pour la procédure d'édition organisée?
Y a-t-il eu des discussions avec la communauté OSM française?
Phil

163113856 10 months ago

Merci Alain
Tout d'abord, je ne suis pas convaincu que la suppression des données existantes soit la bonne façon de procéder, avez-vous discuté de cette modification avant de commencer? Nous préférons que les nouvelles données soient confondues avec les données existantes ra Vous êtes un tout nouveau cartographe et la taille de ces modifications me met mal à l'aise.
Pouvez-vous discuter de cette importation avec la communauté française?
Si ce n'est pas le cas, faites-le avant de continuer.
Vous devez également être conscient de
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Guidelines

163117020 10 months ago

Encore une fois, beaucoup de nœuds d'adresse ont été supprimés, pourquoi?

Phil

162923294 10 months ago

Qu'est-ce que le projet cd14?