OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
163113856 10 months ago

Bonjour Alain
Phil du groupe de travail sur les données ici.
Dans cet ensemble de modifications, vous avez supprimé un très grand nombre de nœuds d'adresse, ce qui a perdu beaucoup de données importantes.
Je me demande pourquoi?

163001564 10 months ago

Hi Wendi
Phil from the Data Working Group here.
I am wondering what sources are you using for these edits?
Bessborough Gardens is a public park so tagging this path as private seems unlikely.
Cheers Phil

155698436 10 months ago

node/12133938342#map=16/52.16930/-3.90377 is a very odd place for a toll gantry. What is actually here?

Cheers Phil

161949329 10 months ago

Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

161973993 10 months ago

Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

162011001 10 months ago

Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

162151594 10 months ago

Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

162174995 10 months ago

Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

162557918 10 months ago

Reverted in changeset/162562034 DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .

153467823 10 months ago

No problem. Andy Townsends maps show relation names along with prow_ref which are useful for rights of way in England and Wales, carto misses these things.

Cheers Phil

153467823 10 months ago

Hi Ceirios
The names of long distance footpaths are not put on the individual ways. They belong on the route relation, which already exists in this case. These way also form part of The Wales Coastpath relation.
relation/77964

Cheers Phil

162298889 11 months ago

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

162298906 11 months ago

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

162298979 11 months ago

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

162297567 11 months ago

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

162298815 11 months ago

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

162298859 11 months ago

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

162299081 11 months ago

This edit has been fully reverted in changeset/162299240 DWG Revert of Vandalism by suspected sockpuppet account

162257710 11 months ago

Hola
Phil del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos aquí.

Sus ediciones han sido marcadas como sospechosas y, al investigar, he descubierto que ha eliminado un gran número de edificios.

Por favor, no lo hagas, es una falta de respeto a otros mapeadores cuyo trabajo y tiempo estás desperdiciando. Por favor, mejore el mapeo existente, no elimine los objetos que existen.

Voy a revertir tus eliminaciones.

Hello
Phil from the Data Working Group here.

Your edits have been flagged as suspicious and on investigation I have found that you have deleted a very large number of buildings. Please do no do this, it is disrespectful to other mappers whose work and time you are throwing away. Please improve exiting mapping, do not delete objects which exist.

I will revert your deletions.

161678411 11 months ago

Hi
Surveying objects for OpenStreetMap is fine, if you are there and capture a GPS trace, that is the gold standard and you should use that in OSM.
We can also use out of copyright OSM maps, which are available as leyers in josm.
What we cannot do is use premium OS maps as these are not opendata and your usage is only licenced for personal use, which mapping in OSM is not.

Hope this helps.

Cheers Phil