Intrigued what was weird about the tagging?

Hi
way/1208820049 seems a bit odd for a bridleway. Bicycle should be yes and horse designated although the difference between yes and designated in unimportant. It shouldn't be destination.

Both OSM objects valid, one is an administrative county which provides the usual council services.
The ceremonial county still covers other things. Each should have its own wikidata and Wikipedia items, as do others in the UK.

Bore da
The name:cy tag you have added is in English, not Ysgol something?

Diolch Phil

Why have you deleted these ways which are clearly visible on aerial imagery?

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Why unclassified, these are private and very restricted? Service is perfect, its not as through you can drive around the Roundabout and come back out.

What is the source of this edit?

There is no evidence of this being oneway on https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.300557%7E0.931243&lvl=18.6&pi=-14.8&style=x&dir=19.9

Cheers Phil

As a local mapper I am intrigued by what sources you were using to determine that this canal is open?

Hi, thank you for your edit.

It is good practice when changing a node to a building to retain the node as part of the building, rather than deleting it. This helps to preserve history.

Cheers Phil

As silversurfer says, don't change this one but split your changes in future into smaller areas

Please keep changes like this to sensible areas. This covers two continents and creates a bounding box covering most of Europe and the eastern US and Canada.

Such changes should be split to limit them to a single country.

Still deleted way/123801601/history

Also routing no longer seems to work.

If we use the railway rather than the dedicated shuttle route how do we then ensure that routing doesn't then continue around the circle to leave at the boarding station?

The problem we now have is that routing is seriously broken and is now using a service entrance, rather than the actual check in.

Whilst motor_vehicle=permissive may be true, not tagging everything inside that area as permissive is bound to cause problems, also not leaving the primary route as easy as possible for routers is bound to cause problems.

The wiki is intended to document mapping practices and not dictate. As SK53 says, OSM is 20 years old. Have we been doing it wrong for all that time? I don't think so.

These changes need to be reverted so that we can get back to a working point in time.

Phil

Hi
What is the User Manual of which you speak?

In OSM we have a wiki, but that is intended to document how we map, not dictate how we should map.

That tagging you are changing has been in place for a very long time, so is probably not broken.

Cheers Phil

This seems kind of unlikely, what is the source of these edits?

Hi
Please make changeset comments clear and informative to make it clear to local mappers what you are changing and why.
Relations such a "Strategic Road Network" do not belong in OSM, please read osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

Also A458(T) (England) is not a name so doesn't belong in the name tag, A558 is a ref. Where did you source it from? (T) looks very antiquated and data consumers can derived from highway=trunk.

Cheers Phil

Hi, this edit has gone very wrong. An unclassified road is usual expected to be metalled. This is clearly a track across an arable field. Only used by tractors and very very unlikely to have public access and even less likely to have public vehicle access.

What sources are you using for these edits and why such a random username?