Fixing cuisine on a demolished:amenity.

Did you even look at the other tags?

Actually a note to say whats here now would have been more appropriate.

As Jerry says, the difference between an office and a shop is an important distinction.

There is little point going to an office outside of its opening hours, a shop however will have photos and details of properties displayed in the window which people looking to move browse. Estate agents even put these in lit frames to make this possible. The same for travel agents, late deals are displayed in the window and are looked at by potential customers when the shop is closed.

Phil

Why?
This edit looses important information such as those estate agents that deal work hidden away in offices to those who have a Shop Window where properties can be browsed when they are closed.

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Other than on motorway foot restrictions in the UK are very rare,

Foot=no means illegal, not just its not a good idea.

Can you provide any actual evidence for these being actual restrictions? For example based on this edit I would expect a sign here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=134056902047426

I have certainly not seen any such signs on the A40 or A449. Restrictions on primary roads are even less likely.

Cheers Phil

Thank you Mike, although now I am more confused as the road/bridge shown in your photo is not mapped?

The sign says "unsuitable for motor vehicles" which in osm should be motor vehicles=discouraged.

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1045307

Obviously only passable at low tide and it is up to drivers to assess their vehicle and conditions and not blindly follow their satnav.

What legal restrictions are there of trucks not being allowed to use this road?

The only visible signage is that motor vehicles can use it only for access which has been incorrectly mapped as motorcar and motor_cycle.

Truck is not a valid tag in osm however I have corrected the tagging to motor_vehicle=destination.

What sources are you using for this edit?

Is there a legal restriction here?

Why are 3.5t vehicles a special problem?

Again that should only be used if it is signed, but why would a router tell someone to do a U-turn and go back to where it came from?

Only if it is legally signed as having such a restriction. We do not add restrictions just because we think it's not suitable.

We can add physical restrictions such as the width to inform routers, but maxwidth should only be used if it is a legally signed restriction.

No response, reverted

How is the weird website you added for Wroxeter in any way related to Wroxeter?

Thank you for your reply however Wikipedia is not a valid source for OSM.

It it is not released under the correct license. The big question is where did Wikipedia get that information from.

What are you trying to achieve here? It's unusual to tag a no U-turn that goes back on itself.

It seems an odd place to find a legal turn restriction in a location such as this.

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/371992 and https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/372001 looks like a track and a ford to me

Please do not delete wikipedia and wikidata tags, that is vandalism.

Please do not delete wikipedia and wikidata tags, that is vandalism.