I do remember the loomio thread now. Rereading it nobody said it was a good idea. In fact sk53 explained very well why you shouldn't make such relations.

The UK has a very active community and this type of edit should have been consulted.

I am not sure what this relation achieves, we already have the data which can easily be found with https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yRS

I also wonder why, if these relations are a good idea, they weren't created many years ago.

Cheers Phil

Hi
Where were these edits discussed with the community?

They seem to fall into the category osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories.

The UK has a very active comm

Hi Redwoods
Just to make you aware that in this changeset you dragged node/1519211300/history to the junction of Rutland Street and Humberstone Gate.

Please be careful to check and review your edits before you upload.

This has been fixed.

Cheers Phil

Trunk roads restored

Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your edits however this changeset has gone very wrong. These roads are not primary.

The A458 through Welshpool is trunk (green signs). Salop Road is now just tertiary (it has no ref signs anymore) since the A458 trunk route moved to Mill Street. I surveyed it myself a few weeks ago.

Cheers Phil

Apart from there is no concept of traffic circles in the UK. Junction=circular is used on roundabouts with traffic lights although routers treat them exactly the same as roundabouts.
Cheers Phil

It cannot be defined as a traffic circle. It is just a one way road.

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Hi after discussion with others in the UK community and noting the changeset comment on version #18 stating it is the mainline of the A14 we believe that this edit should be reverted back to trunk.

Cheers Phil

Fixed after community discussion

Again this edit is incorrect. There is no junction=circular here. It is just a dual carriageway with double cross-cuts.

The direction is also incorrect. way/140650910 should be trunk_link.

Cheers Phil

Again not a roundabout, should be junction=circular as it has traffic lights.

Cheers Phil

Hi again
This is also not a roundabout, its not a junction=circular either. Imagery shows give way markings so just a oneway road.
On streetside imagery you can see there is a parking lane on the right, which confirms it is not a roundabout.

Cheers Phil

Hi
This edit is incorrect. This is a circular one way road, not a roundabout.

The roads joining have standard give way markings, not roundabout entry markings.

It was correctly mapped before and needs to be reverted.

Cheers Phil

Sorry Alex, I meant to comment on the version after yours.

Cheers Phil

Bore da
This edit has gone very wrong.

It was correct before you changed it, now it points to the wrong page

Diolch Phil

Hi, this edit does not make a lot of sense.

It now says name=Asda brand=Spar, which is it?

Cheers Phil

Thank you.
My suspicion is that this never was a bridge. Carreghofa Lane originally crossed bridge 93, which now carries the cycleway slightly to the west.

This needs a survey, which I will do if it stops raining for long enough, but my suspicion is that the bridge and note tags should be removed.

Dropped bridge is a copy of an error in wikipedia. It is not a bridge but filled in with a culvert running through it.

I have removed the bridge tags.

Cheers Phil

Bore da
This edit has gone a little wrong and has lost important information.

Have you visited and seen something that has recently changed?

In merging 'identical' ways together you have also merged the way that connected them which is not identical, way/925258534/history. This short section is in a culvet so no boats can pass, unless of course its a coracle which you can carry.

This edit needs to be reverted however I am intrigued as to why you made it.

Diolch Phil