OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
102537962 almost 5 years ago

In this change you have duplicated many roads with secondary, this is very damaging and I am reverting this edit.

102523966 almost 5 years ago

Hi, in this edit you seem to have created a very small duplicate hospital.
I have removed this duplication.

Cheers Phil

102488198 almost 5 years ago

Hi, thank you for your edit.

In OSM we should not copy from third-party plans without explicit permission.

The gold standard in OSM is to simply go and have a look and map what you have seen and use source=survey.

Cheers Phil

102440180 almost 5 years ago

Just wondering why you added a motorway here?

102458219 almost 5 years ago

Bore da
Croisi Y OSM, place=village is a very strange way to tag houses and gardens. Please take care to capture what is actually visible on imagery.

Diolch Phil

102233276 almost 5 years ago

Hi
Names in OSM are for things that have an actual name, in the case of roads have an actual sign.

Please do not add descriptions to the name tag.

See osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Cheers Phil

101181262 almost 5 years ago

This route is a legally a bridleway.

Have added appropriate access tags, setting the middle track section to private for motor vehicles which will prevent motor vehicles from being routed that way whilst maintaining access for foot/bikes/horses and farm vehicles

Cheers Phil

102179815 almost 5 years ago

Why have you removed the traffice islands here? One of your colleagues vandalised this area two days ago, and has yet to respond to my comments.

I am reverting this again as it was correct.

Cheers Phil

102051491 almost 5 years ago

You also broke the transition point between the 40 mph and 50 mph zones which is clear if you select the best imagery.

102051491 almost 5 years ago

Hi, this edit is very very wrong. Queensway is not a dual carriageway, there are just some small islands either side of the traffic lights.

Roads should only be mapped as separate ways where there is physical separation.

I am reverting this edit.

101564659 almost 5 years ago

Legally a bridleway so motor_vehicle=private and added access tags for foot/horses and bikes

101920017 almost 5 years ago

The track you have photos of is probably Turners Lane. This section is legally a public footpath and therefore should not be used by motor vehicles, that is not to mention the geography of the area. Turners Lane is diagonal for a reason.

101181262 almost 5 years ago

Who are you working for?

Please read a conform to https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines before making further changes to the map.

Tagging in osm is about what is legal, not what is safe or possible for vans. This track is used by agricultural vehicles and is legal for horses and cyclists. Adding a tracktype will indicate to a router if it is suitable for a particular type of vehicle.

101660986 almost 5 years ago

Then the motor_vehicle=no is redundant.

101920017 almost 5 years ago

What is DA?

Cheers Phil

101181262 almost 5 years ago

I have changed this to a track, it is certainly not a footpath and it is certainly usable by farm vehicles. The edit history suggests it may be used by Amazon vans.

Cheers Phil

101660986 almost 5 years ago

Hi, a oneway street on which there is a node prohibiting motor vehicles seems a bit odd. Are you sure?

Cheers Phil

101919793 almost 5 years ago

Leads to a farm, so service

101920017 almost 5 years ago

Restored footpath, certainly not a track

70980491 almost 5 years ago

However amenity=yes is totally meaningless, although that was fixed by a maproulette challenge and if the polygon was incorrect then most mappers would spend a few minutes fixing it rather than doing the bare minimum

Cheers Phil