trigpoint's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 102912173 | over 4 years ago | The 60 mph limit does not extend to the roundabout. There is a 40 mph zone which I have added. |
| 102671857 | over 4 years ago | I see that you colleague has added the 50 mph section, although I have fixed his 30 mph section at Penley, it is 20 mph. Your driver must have been mistaken if he thought the limit was 60.
I intended to update the limits, but had other life stuff to do but felt it was more import that incorrect high limits are not displayed on a drivers satnav. No limit will always to better than being told I can do 60 when the limit is 50. Cheers Phil |
| 102671857 | over 4 years ago | I am intending to map the correct speed limits once I finish processing my video files. However you have not answered my questions. Cheers Phil |
| 102671857 | over 4 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM thank you for your edit however you have added incorrect speedlimit data. Where did you obtain the GPS traces you are using and what visual confirmation did you use? Also what does ITS stand for? Cheers Phil |
| 103038818 | over 4 years ago | Sorry, got it UK Quarterly Project |
| 103038818 | over 4 years ago | What does #ukqp mean? |
| 102928960 | over 4 years ago | Are you sure that node/8629001726 is really preventing access? Hook Park Lane is tagged as a byway which indicates that it is a legal right of way making this gate either odd, or illegal. By tagging this as access=no you are preventing pedestrians using this route. Cheers Phil |
| 100180827 | over 4 years ago | Is this really a dual carriageway? It looks like a single carriageway on bing imagery. Cheers Phil |
| 102889219 | over 4 years ago | Hi
Whilst in this case I probably didn't choose the best tag in landuse, simply moving the surveyed information that there is a garden here to the fact that you can sit down outside, which is not the same as I can sit in a pleasant garden. Please bear this in mind when fixing tags remotely. Cheers Phil |
| 102705997 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however I believe this task has been stopped. Many of the buildings you have mapped do not match the real outline. For example way/928909762 overlaps an already drawn building and you have included the garden within the building outline. This has occurred in many parts of this changeset. I am going to review and possibly revert this changeset. Cheers Phil
|
| 102427082 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. You seem to have added a short section of primary road over a residential road.
Cheers Phil |
| 102595615 | almost 5 years ago | Please do not add public roads in quarry, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit. |
| 102595146 | almost 5 years ago | Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit. |
| 102595048 | almost 5 years ago | Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit. |
| 102594964 | almost 5 years ago | Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit. |
| 102594816 | almost 5 years ago | Please do not duplicate roads, the HOT task is about adding buildings. Your edits are extremely damaging. I am reverting this edit. |
| 102587072 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong. way/927881965 and other buildings you have drawn are not single terraces, there are service ways passing between them so they should be split. Cheers Phil |
| 102536325 | almost 5 years ago | You have added a lot of place=village, which is clearly not what is here. Please only add what is verifiable on the ground. |
| 102539005 | almost 5 years ago | This edit is very damaging, please do not add random roads to OSM |
| 102545565 | almost 5 years ago | This edit is very damaging, please do not add random roads to OSM |