Wat's Dyke Way is already mapped as a relation, it is incorrect to duplicate that name on individual paths. That is not the name of the path, but of one of the routes that passes over it.

The names you have added seem unlikely, just because things can be translated doesn't mean they should be. Its unlikely many French, Spanish or Italians have even heard of it.

And the source of these names is?

Other than Shrewsbury and Yr Amwythig I have never seen any of these names in use.

In this case possibly, will need a survey which I will try this week.

Paving stones sounds a bit odd here as they are normally used outdoors.

I would expect some sort of tiles?

Cheers Phil

So what happens when, at least part of, this area becomes UTC+1 for most of the year?

Surely to be useful timezones are based on country/state boundaries?

No response after a week so reverting this edit.

No response after a week so reverting this edit.

No response after a week so reverting this edit.

According to FHRS its called Global Grocers, so grocer or convenience.

I will restore the building and fix it.

Wouldn't it be better to have not thrown away the history and address tags and mapped the market? Although I am not really sure what you mean by a market. The market being a large area in the city centre.

Surely it would have been better to improve the map by adding the other buildings that make up the terrace, as has been done the other side of Britton Street.

I am no sure what you mean by a market, but did you happen to get the name. It would be useful to add it, whatever it is.

Hi
Whilst banks closing is not unusual has it really been demolished? Chances are the building is in use for something else, or maybe empty awaiting a new tennant.

Whilst the tags associating it with a bank can be removed, the other tags (building, addr:* and urpn) still remain valid and should be retained.

Cheers Phil

Precisely what street level imagery are you using?

Are you sure about this?

The original postcode was surveyed using a printed reciept and matches that shown on FHRS and is points right at the garage if you type it into OSM search.

NSUL cannot be considered a valid source for armchair edits which break existing survey data.

I am reverting this edit.

Hi
You still are not quoting the sources you are using for these changesets or replied to previous comments.

Are you sure you have the change in the right place?

What evidence do you have that it is illegal to walk on these roads.

Pedestrians being prohibited is extremely rare in the UK and in such cases you will find signs such as osm.wiki/File:UK_traffic_sign_625.1.svg. I do not recall such a sign here.

Cheers Phil

Except use of streetview is not allowed for OSM editing, this change needs to be reverted.

Again what sources are you using for these edits?

In this edit you have changed way/117883015 from 30 mph to 40 mph which now contradicts signage visible in open sources.

Why have you made this change?

Cheers Phil

What is the source of this edit, it feels very unlikely that the speed limit would be increased here and contradicts available open sources?

What is the source of this apparently remote edit?

Cheers Phil