Do you agree with the 50m between St Andrews and McKay allowing bicycles?

thanks

Thanks. As I am sure you already know, we can't use Apple or Google images.

Hi, though there are dangers in trying to understand a tag's meaning from its dictionary meaning, its a useful place to start. A pipestem is a shared driveway, it may not have a kerb, footpath or street lights, it is not council maintained, it may not have garbage pickup or postal delivery.
Why do you think that pipestem works here?

Starting with the first of the previous link
1 my finger and cnr Bluff and Tulip
4 cnr Tulip and Garnet Leary
5 closeup signs
9 end of lane, Garnet Leary
10 looking back
14 Fern St
15 Tricks Res
18 McKay Ave
19 looking back
20 lane to Cheltenham Rd
21 End of McKay
22 End of St Andrews
23 ditto
29 Cheltenham Rd
30 ditto
31 Whitton crt
33 St Andrews
42 Lane nth to McKay
48 McKay
50 gate from Tricks Res
52 end Bluff Rd

photos at https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-37.962247513974&lng=145.01882162969002&z=18.085357379143982&pKey=158986949844367&focus=photo

Hi, what is your logic for using pipestem? For example https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-38.01492&lng=145.257661&z=17.083298821778893&pKey=526977095005135&focus=photo&x=0.48560642412072974&y=0.6683125847980452&zoom=0 looks like a service road to me rather than a shared driveway.

Got this one, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.907024846494&lng=145.1450726617&z=17&pKey=942142336618652&focus=photo&x=0.5080910450522189&y=0.6668242570238845&zoom=0

Again, I can't read it on mapillary, if you were there why not take a mapillary photo.

I can't read the sign in Mapillary, presumably you went there? Why not capture a photo of the sign while you are there?

Hi, Photos to come, meanwhile I think St Andrews Crt is the cycle route, not the footpath, the 50metres through park is cycleway. I think its the 50m of park that Sebastian will dispute but best have the photos as hard evidence before discussing. Thanks Tony

I think you need the psv=yes if you have access=no ?

Hi, "access changed to private as signage indicates access to residents only" it would save others lots of time if you gave more info on the signage, whether visible on mapillary or you have to go there in person, the wording of the sign too,

Hi Sebastian, I took some Mapillary photos. I will discuss this further when the photo uploads are done, probably on talk_au

And then there's Kings Domain too

Hi, I did see your Botanic Gardens link but some lie in Government house which may share the same prohibition

Hi. Do you have any no bicycle signs or footway only signs?

Hi, I have recorded Mapillary images. There is no signage prohibiting transit traffic. The access=destination should be removed. See comment https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-March/016036.html

Please discuss at talk au, if I dont hear from you I assume its OK to revert this and similar cases
Thanks
Tony
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-38.456087457862026&lng=145.25094882914004&z=17&pKey=353381520063445

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-38.456047769098&lng=145.24980862796&z=17&pKey=5422344284442260

Hi, in case you are not monitoring talk-au, letting you know that I have posted on the use of access=destination.

Hi. This is where changeset comments are helpful. With this and previous edits and reversions its very hard for me to work out what you have done. Ideally the changeset comment should say what you have done and why. We, including me, are all guilty of this to some extent.