Hi, you have a number of vehicle roads in Bunurong Park tagged bicycle=no This seems inconsistent with their publicity: "you are welcome to enjoy the grounds, ... or explore this unique property by bike" https://smct.org.au/our-locations/about-bunurong-memorial-park. Do you have any evidence for the tag?

Hi. As I have received no reply I will move ahead. Your alteration of a path to a footway September 2021 was reverted as part of a DWG sanctioned roll back in October 2021. You undid this in December 2022 without discussion. I have visited the site and taken Mapillary photos https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.933649245888&lng=145.19179623218&z=17&pKey=135223432674514&focus=map The original tagging as path seems sound to me but there is always room for discussion. I will return it to the path it was after the DWG sanctioned roll back. Where there are differences of opinion it is better to discuss rather than undo. If you think the tagging is wrong please discuss it here or at talk_au. I remind you of the community consensus that the absence of signage allowing bicycles is not in itself sufficient evidence that bicycles are disallowed. Finally, thank you for your many contributions to OSM.

Hi. What lead you to the conclusion that these paths are better tagged as footways? Thanks.

Hi, in general you don't need bicycle=yes/no unless bikes are being treated differently from other forms, for example in 28065299 access=private is probably all that needs be said.

see changeset/112144836
WandererEarth edits

Yes HighRouleur, the last sign entering from either side is an end shared path. Mapillary was out of date. I have uploaded new Mapillary, available soon.

Hi, could you please give a link or GPS for the sign you saw? I have found https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-38.0198354&lng=145.2980154&z=17&pKey=463720531384332&focus=photo&x=0.28994845932415925&y=0.7015664068221198&zoom=2.0107238605898123 which indicates it is shared from Magid east.

Hi, I have ridden what I thought was a cycleway on the east side of Hallam Rd quite a few times. What was your reason for bicycle=no Way: 996765439
also 998066195 and 1000952152 seem strange. Thanks Tony

see Changeset: 112144836

Hi. Maybe I have it wrong. Ill put it to the talk_au group again.

Hi. There is good street level imagery of way/1008258040. It is not a sidewalk. You will recall from previous discussion that "no signs present to indicated bikes are permitted" is, on its own, insufficient reason to remove bicycle=yes. Can you give any other reason why the bicycle=yes should not be reinstated?

And nothing is lost forever e.g. camp4 is still recorded in the history as Location: -27.9196474, 134.7547635

Hi. I guess so. I don't know how often maps.me server updates itself from the open street map server. Similarly I don't know in which circumstances your map app updates itself from the maps.me server.

Hi Andrew. I dont intend doing any more deletes of your stuff. Maybe I have missed one or two but the majority of your contributions look really useful to me.

Hi. Sorry I am not a map.me user. I am just a humble volunteer on openstreetmap. I have heard that the map.me feature which allows edits to openstreetmap is poorly documented and many users are confused. Try a long press to add a waypoint but avoid anything sounding like edit the map. Or try googling your problem. Or inquire on a discussion forum. But please do keep uploading your map edits, the public ones, your contributions are really useful.

Hi Andrew. Thank you for your contributions to the map. The issue is that this is a public map. I presume camp8 fixed car and firewood are your personal notes and not suitable for sharing on a public map.

Hi, deleted 10 features in Changeset #126349125

Hi is the airbnb a private note?

Hi, is this a private note?

Hi, is this a private note?