Hi, which way are you referring to? Unless I have made a mistake, it is bicycle=yes west of the creek and management vehicles and walkers only east of the creek

In a PM from the Area Chief Ranger he advises that no tracks are completely closed to the public, the most restrictive is management vehicles and walkers only, east of the creek Changeset #121515744

See 121312317 and 121311965 south crossing changed to lights and shared path, north crossing added as footway but its not connected yet

Once the shared use crossings are created at each end of the intersection, it won't matter what the tags are on 198521879 and 12071643 for bike or pedestrian access. Maybe it affects U turn cyclists on Springvale Rd but I can't see that that matters.

Thanks for adding a crossing. There should be a crossing at the north east end too. crossing= marked should probably be crossing=traffic_signals.
Both crossings are shared path, the mapillary shows this. Good work.

That's highway=motorway_link ?
"Use highway=motorway_link for link roads (sliproads / ramps) leading to and from a highway=motorway. These normally have motorway restrictions. These are commonly referred to as On-ramps and Off-Ramps in American English. " You are assuming that it is part of an off/on ramp, that is arguable. I am happy for you to rework this intersection in a way that allows bike connectivity at the crossing lights. If you think that the bike connectivity needs to go then let's refer it to talk-au for advice

Yes, its a difficult one. 198521879 and 12071643 don't actually exist. Springvale Rd is not actually divided at the intersection. There is just a rectangle of asphalt, the intersection. I would be guessing but I doubt the intersection is motorway. My suggestions (a) leave it as is or (b) take it to talk-au for advice

Thanks Ewen and Vadmium

Changeset #121046678 I have restored bicycle=yes, I have changed the crossings to trunk rd, thanks Vadmium for the suggestion, the crossings which are both pedestrian and bike still need to be linked to for routing

see Changeset: 120498123

Hi, I think the bicycle access should be reinstated, my reason the pedestrian and bike lights. If I don't hear from you I'll go ahead. If you disagree please discuss on talk-au

But the pedestrian and the cyclists are allowed to cross there, there are pedestrian and cycle traffic lights. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-38.026031651943015&lng=145.13310556370993&z=19.074484937502394&pKey=1084370975616462&focus=photo&x=0.41688244094887994&y=0.7448165152256608&zoom=1.3296853625171

Hi, are sure you are right? Its a difficult one. its not the freeway proper, at best its a ramp. But it can't be both an off ramp and an onramp. Maybe its just a bit of Springvale Rd where off and on rampers make turns. I am surprised that you have left the foot option, pedestrians and bicycles are typically both disallowed. It appears that the tagging of this short stretch of road is to allow crossing Springvale Rd at the lights, I note on Mapillary that they are dual pedestrian/cycle lights. Your thoughts?

see Changeset #120998928, if unhappy please discuss on talk-au

see talk-au

see talk-au

Sebastian, please reply to Bob42nd

see Changeset #120996687

see Changeset #120996630

Hi Sebastian, please reply to Matthew