tonyf1's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 111703043 | over 4 years ago | Hi. Please pause retagging paths, footways, cycleways etc until you have reached a consensus with the mapping community. You have a number of unresolved issues raised in a number of changesets by a number of different people. Thanks. |
| 111425460 | over 4 years ago | Hi, we value your contributions, its people like you, giving their time, that makes OSM work. But you have comments from about 10 different commenters covering a number of issues. None of these issues have been resolved yet. Please engage with the mapping community in a timely manner and work towards a consensus. We regret that if we do not hear from you there is a risk that your work could be deleted. Thanks. |
| 111047967 | over 4 years ago | Hi, see the warning message, you have failed to connect these roads to the wider road system. If you need help to do this ask here |
| 111214842 | over 4 years ago | Hi. what is your reason for tagging the vehicular entry into Wilson Botanic Park Way: 779286923 bicycle=no ? |
| 111391258 | over 4 years ago | Hi. What is your source of information that Browns lane is closed to bicycles? Presumably not that it is a footpath because it seems to allow motor vehicles? |
| 111424877 | over 4 years ago | Hi, i see you have changed your tagging, thanks, but I doubt that you should leave the bicycle=no tag. The way i read it now, its private access but those with the right to enter can use any transport mode except bicycle. Delete the bicycle tag? |
| 111424983 | over 4 years ago | Hi, thanks, I see you using changeset comments in your next changeset, good, much easier to follow.
|
| 111168630 | over 4 years ago | Thanks, its a strange one, Ill have to wait for the covid limit to lift and go and look. My guess is that all the mode specific tags should be removed and one access= tag should remain. |
| 111168630 | over 4 years ago | The Eastern Treatment Plant allows motor vehicles, foot traffic and horses but not bicycles? What is your source? |
| 111391335 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you have tagged a number of minor residential roads service=driveway even though they serve a number of properties eg. Way: Lilliput Lane (203549225) has about 10 properties. The wiki says "a driveway is a minor service road leading to a specific property" |
| 111016252 | over 4 years ago | Hi, thanks for the reply. I doubt that means that all paths are footpaths unless otherwise signed. I am sure the Birdsland paths are not footpaths. I presume that many of the retaggings are from aerial images alone, they span a distance greater than the 5km allowed under Covid. Please give information in changeset comments. It is difficult for us to assess the logic of your changes, the original mapper of a feature presumably physically observed the feature and decided the tags, if you want to change them, possibly solely on the evidence of a aerial image, you need to give information that supports your case. If you took a Mapillary photo you could refer to it in the changeset comments. Its best not to make wholesale changes to how stuff is being mapped without discussing with the community. For the moment, if changing tagging re cycleway footpath path bike yes no designated can you please give a changeset comment for each way that explains what your evidence and logic is.
|
| 111016252 | over 4 years ago | Hi. Why have you changed many paths to bicycle=no? for example way/304507133 I rode that path today and didn't see any no bicycle signs. Perhaps you could also give more detailed comments to help others understand why you have made changes |
| 103165024 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Parks Victoria Lysterfield, yes that's the way to do it
|
| 34134806 | about 5 years ago | osm.org/edit?way=371564143 may be misplaced 20m west or maybe there's a lot of offset in the satellite image |
| 91256207 | over 5 years ago | Thanks tastrax |
| 91404980 | over 5 years ago | Thanks tastrax |
| 91256207 | over 5 years ago | I note node/907225121 is also listed as a place of worship of unspecified religion |
| 91256207 | over 5 years ago | Hi, I have only the information that was on the sign. That included a url sos.org which may give further clues . It may be that it is a place of meditation and not worship. I note a proposal for a tag meditation centre which has not been adopted. |
| 81360634 | almost 6 years ago | Thanks Warin. Autosquare crossed the polygon, probably explains why it was not displaying |
| 57098548 | over 6 years ago | I looked at Ridge Tk and the intersection with Way: 39245854. Couldn't find it so deleting it. |