OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
111703043 over 4 years ago

Hi. Please pause retagging paths, footways, cycleways etc until you have reached a consensus with the mapping community. You have a number of unresolved issues raised in a number of changesets by a number of different people. Thanks.

111425460 over 4 years ago

Hi, we value your contributions, its people like you, giving their time, that makes OSM work. But you have comments from about 10 different commenters covering a number of issues. None of these issues have been resolved yet. Please engage with the mapping community in a timely manner and work towards a consensus. We regret that if we do not hear from you there is a risk that your work could be deleted. Thanks.

111047967 over 4 years ago

Hi, see the warning message, you have failed to connect these roads to the wider road system. If you need help to do this ask here

111214842 over 4 years ago

Hi. what is your reason for tagging the vehicular entry into Wilson Botanic Park Way: 779286923 bicycle=no ?

111391258 over 4 years ago

Hi. What is your source of information that Browns lane is closed to bicycles? Presumably not that it is a footpath because it seems to allow motor vehicles?

111424877 over 4 years ago

Hi, i see you have changed your tagging, thanks, but I doubt that you should leave the bicycle=no tag. The way i read it now, its private access but those with the right to enter can use any transport mode except bicycle. Delete the bicycle tag?

111424983 over 4 years ago

Hi, thanks, I see you using changeset comments in your next changeset, good, much easier to follow.
I presume this changeset is like the treatment plant, you are acting on knowledge that its private? If access is limited maybe use access= xxx rather than mode specific tags? Or is this open to all modes of transport except bicycles?

111168630 over 4 years ago

Thanks, its a strange one, Ill have to wait for the covid limit to lift and go and look. My guess is that all the mode specific tags should be removed and one access= tag should remain.

111168630 over 4 years ago

The Eastern Treatment Plant allows motor vehicles, foot traffic and horses but not bicycles? What is your source?

111391335 over 4 years ago

Hi, you have tagged a number of minor residential roads service=driveway even though they serve a number of properties eg. Way: Lilliput Lane (203549225) has about 10 properties. The wiki says "a driveway is a minor service road leading to a specific property"

111016252 over 4 years ago

Hi, thanks for the reply. I doubt that means that all paths are footpaths unless otherwise signed. I am sure the Birdsland paths are not footpaths. I presume that many of the retaggings are from aerial images alone, they span a distance greater than the 5km allowed under Covid. Please give information in changeset comments. It is difficult for us to assess the logic of your changes, the original mapper of a feature presumably physically observed the feature and decided the tags, if you want to change them, possibly solely on the evidence of a aerial image, you need to give information that supports your case. If you took a Mapillary photo you could refer to it in the changeset comments. Its best not to make wholesale changes to how stuff is being mapped without discussing with the community.

For the moment, if changing tagging re cycleway footpath path bike yes no designated can you please give a changeset comment for each way that explains what your evidence and logic is.
Thanks Tony

111016252 over 4 years ago

Hi. Why have you changed many paths to bicycle=no? for example way/304507133 I rode that path today and didn't see any no bicycle signs. Perhaps you could also give more detailed comments to help others understand why you have made changes

103165024 almost 5 years ago

Hi Parks Victoria Lysterfield, yes that's the way to do it
access=no
highway=path
Another point, its good to give a unique changeset comment which describes your intent with the edit eg "removed description from name, the track has no name"

34134806 about 5 years ago

osm.org/edit?way=371564143 may be misplaced 20m west or maybe there's a lot of offset in the satellite image

91256207 over 5 years ago

Thanks tastrax

91404980 over 5 years ago

Thanks tastrax

91256207 over 5 years ago

I note node/907225121 is also listed as a place of worship of unspecified religion

91256207 over 5 years ago

Hi, I have only the information that was on the sign. That included a url sos.org which may give further clues . It may be that it is a place of meditation and not worship. I note a proposal for a tag meditation centre which has not been adopted.

81360634 almost 6 years ago

Thanks Warin. Autosquare crossed the polygon, probably explains why it was not displaying

57098548 over 6 years ago

I looked at Ridge Tk and the intersection with Way: 39245854. Couldn't find it so deleting it.