I merged the office node into the smaller building because it's unacceptable to add incorrect data like this. Add the node where the object actually exists on the ground, not wherever you want, to avoid creating confusion in people who navigate there.

And also, it is completely acceptable to have the name of the company added in "name" tag of the surrounding land use element. Why did you move it to operator?

I want to add that undelete option comes with a plugin called "undelete" and revert option comes with a plugin called "reverter". You can find plugins' list in Preferences menu.

Correct tag would be "disused:man_made=water_tower". But an alternative would be: "man_made=water_tower" with "disused=yes" to make it remain visible on the map.

At least this mapper did redraw these elements in the same changeset. They might not have fully mastered editing with JOSM yet, they're a new mapper after all. That's why they might be finding it easier and faster to just delete and redraw. Have you explained this mapper how to edit elements in JOSM efficiently at least once? Recommend ways how they can improve their editing experience?

Tags "disused" netika noņemts. Ja vieta ir atvērta, tad šis tags ir nederīgs.

*for each plot of brownfield area

Pameklēju wiki.osm.org un taginfo.osm.org, bet nevaru atrast ieteikumus, kā jāapzīmē koku lapotnes. Man šķiet, ka parasti neviens lapotni vizuāli nezīmē kokiem OSM'ā, vien apraksta to izmēru ar tagu osm.wiki/Tag:diameter_crown=. Taču var arī izgudrot jaunus tagus, ja vēlas zīmēt, piemēram, uzzīmēt lapotnes elementu un likt tree=foliage. Šo jautājumu derētu pajautāt community.openstreetmap.org, lai uzklausītu arī citu kartētāju idejas.

Nedrīkts likt meža elementu ap koku lapotnēm, ja tās ir lielas. Šajā izmaiņu kopā tas tika izdarīts ap dižozolu, bet ap dižozolu neviens cits koks, cits saprotu no ortofoto, neatrodas. Meža elementu liek tikai tad, ja vienā vietā ir daudz koku tuvu viens pie otra.

Tātad arī šeit [1] ir nepareizi?

[1] osm.org/#map=18/-54.179780/-36.711030

Kuros gadījumos tad "name" būtu jāizmanto?

Esmu jau izlasījis to wiki lapu un nepiekrītu šim teikumam. Pārāk daudz balstīties tikai uz wiki teikto neiesaku. Wiki rakstītais nav cieši jāievēro, tas ir tikai jāņem kā padoms. Plus, šo wiki jebkurš var labot. Tai skaitā arī šajā lapā kāds var kādreiz šo teikumu pārveidot, rakstot, ka koku rindas jādzēš ārā, ja atsevišķi koki ir salikti.

Nevajag uztraukties vai kaut kur kaut kas ir redzams vai nē. Ja kaut kas nav redzams, tad tā ir konkrētās kartes renderētāja "vaina", nevis lietotāja "vaina".

Manuprāt, koku rindas būtu jāliek tikai tad, ja lietotājs nevar (ja ortofoto nav skaidrs un ielas attēls nav pieejams, piemēram) vai nevēlas likt katru koku atsevišķi. Bet, ja ir katrs koks ielikts atsevišķi, tad koku rindas elements zaudē jēgu un būtu jādzēš ārā.

Sveiks! Kādu jēgu saredzi koku rindu zīmēšanā, ja atsevišķi koku punkti jau ir salikti?

I didn't request a review, JOSM added that without my knowledge.

I already told you that localities in OSM sense are uninhabited places. I even linked a wiki article in a changeset comment which you obviously did not read since you are doing this again. "Apiņa apkaime" wasn't tagged as neighbourhood but as suburb yet your changeset comment says that it was a neighbourhood. It's not quite clear what you are trying to achieve here. As I have observed, you don't wish to discuss this situation. If you keep edit warring you will get banned.

Here are links to wiki articles, again: place=locality
place=suburb
place=neighbourhood

It's alright. Feel free to fix this.

I only deleted multipolygons converting them to simple polygons in this changeset. I didn't add or change anything else. The scrub you are talking about[1] already had fence drawn around it. Fence was added in this[2] changeset. And the element you intend to reference with this number is actually a way not node[1].

[1] way/980061107
[2] changeset/110790907

Nav nepareizi, ja "landuse=retail" un "amenity=fuel" birkas ir uzliktas tam pašam elemantam. Šādi ir sakartēti daudz citi benzīntanki Rīgā.

Ja benzīntankā ir arī veikals, tad jāliek klāt arī "landuse=retail".

"place=locality" is used if location is uninhabited. In this case your edit is wrong. I encourage you to read the wiki pages of both "locality" and "suburb".

place=locality
place=suburb