"Updated name of road, resolving note/2654884" -- this is what your changeset comment *should* have been.

Most changesets are to "fix[] a problem" so making that the comment tells us absolutely nothing new.

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I have cleaned up the issues with your recent edit/addition. Most notably, the phone number, website, and suite (addr:unit) were in the wrong formats. Also, in general OpenStreetMap is not the place for ad copy (changesets are noindex and nofollow) and hashtags are used to describe the changeset, not to advertise.

In most cases, name=* should not merely repeat the address of the building. The exception is some office buildings where the address is also used as the building identity.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please note that on OpenStreetMap, street/road names should be spelled out, not abbreviated. Other than that this is a good first edit.

description=* MUST NOT be used for advertising copy or similar rubbish. Please cease and desist.

It looks like you changed the Sugar Land city boundary as part of this changeset. What is your data source for this change?

Hi,

Changeset comments should be at least nominally descriptive of the actual content of that changeset. "Various corrections" only tells us what we already know and adds nothing. It's as useful as an empty changeset comment.

Also, please confine each changeset to smaller areas than this. There is no reason for one changeset to span multiple countries/continents.

---

Salut,

Les commentaires de l'ensemble de modifications doivent être au moins nominalement descriptifs du contenu réel de cet ensemble de modifications. "Corrections diverses" ne nous dit que ce que nous savons déjà et n'ajoute rien. C'est aussi utile qu'un commentaire d'ensemble de modifications vide.

Veuillez également limiter chaque ensemble de modifications à des zones plus petites que celle-ci. Il n'y a aucune raison pour qu'un ensemble de modifications s'étende sur plusieurs pays/continents.

If you are still out there and remember, what was your data source for the name "Lake Riverstone Lane"? Someone has since changed it to "Lake Riverstone Drive" and based on the circumstances it's a suspicious edit at first glance.

Reverted

These are historic names which came from USGS Geonames. If this was truly a privacy issue it would have been addressed long ago. Reverting in full.

We have had several dubious edits of the Sugar Land border in the past few months. What is your data source for this?

The bounding box shows it's in the Sugar Land area, and "made changes" is implied. This changeset comment also tells us nothing useful about what you've actually edited.

None of these edits involve highways. This changeset comment is actually deceptive about the true content of your edits.

What types of changes and/or what is the purpose of your changes? "Made changes to [road names]" doesn't really tell us anything.

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I have cleaned up some minor issues with your first changeset. Specifically:

* Names should be in mixed case, not all capital letters.
* Boundary relations are for the boundaries of cities, counties, states, countries, etc and even then admin_level=1 is generally not used.
* Area features should usually not be glued to roads.

Other than that, looks like you are off to a good start.

Oops, sources should have included TIGER Roads 2020

Great work. I just read the story on Jalopnik and was about to update this myself but you beat me to it.

operator=* is used for the entity operating the given mapped item. Anne McCormick Sullivan isn't operating much of anything, as she's been dead since 2013. Generally it's not necessary to tag operator=* for items such as school playgrounds anyway, so I've removed this.

Also, what exactly was being built at the corner of Will Clayton Parkway and Rustic Timbers Drive?

Per the definition in the wiki, these aren't mini-roundabouts. They appear to be closest to traffic_calming=island, so that's what I've changed them to.