OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
164231460 9 months ago

If you edit this, 'All' is shown as No, but if you just view the map, 'Access' is shown as No. Quality. What a waste of time.

164230768 9 months ago

THE ROUTE IS INCORRECT. YOU REMOVED THE EDIT THAT CORRECTED THIS. YOU PRODUCE JUNK.

164231580 9 months ago

A map exists to serve users, in this case cyclists.
In this case, it fails that purpose, rendering it useless junk.

164231460 9 months ago

Under Allowed Access:
All = no
Foot = yes
This is correct.

164230768 9 months ago

Weird. Really weird. I'll make certain my roads aren't mapped.
Thanks to your mods, the map here is once again completely incorrect, mixing private and public tracks.
I'll notify the lawyer who owns this land and perhaps you can discuss your actions with him.

164230586 9 months ago

Just because a government paints what looks like a bike lane, that doesn't make it a bike lane.
This is a semi truck route and cyclists are being routed alongside these trucks traveling at 60kph, while being expected to cycle alongside in a lane so narrow that a bike symbol doesn't fit.
More junk maps.

164231580 9 months ago

How can it be a standard width bike lane if the painted bike symbol doesn't fit in it?
Your edits are just producing junk useless maps.

164230768 9 months ago

Why are you mapping roads made by people on their own land?

164230586 9 months ago

Just because someone paints a lane with a bike symbol in it, that doesn't make it a bike lane. Oh it's tricky.

164231580 9 months ago

REGARDLESS OF THE SIZE? I take it you don't cycle?
When is a painted bike lane not a functional bike lane then? 300mm wide? Never?
If someone paints a lane on a road and deems it suitable for cycling, but is so narrow that a bike symbol cannot fit in it THEN IT'S PROBABLY NOT SUITABLE FOR CYCLING IN ALONGSIDE 2+ TON VEHICLES TRAVELING AT 60kph. REAL ROCKET SCIENCE.
I gather you don't cycle? Or are you up for a ride in this fake bike lane in the middle of a weekday? Let me guess...... nah!
Do you work for SA's DIT?

164231208 9 months ago

You just go about reverting edits without fixing any problems.
The mapping of the bike lane on this road is complete rubbish and endangers cyclist's lives.

164230768 9 months ago

I'm quite close to reporting you.
You remove edits without addressing the original problem.
I had fixed the routing of this path. I have visited it in person. Have you?

164230586 9 months ago

The bike lane attributes of the A5 need to be removed. It's one thing to revert my edit, quite another to ignore the reason for my edit.